Literature DB >> 8021373

Reference accuracy in the dermatologic literature.

P M George1, K Robbins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reference list is an important part of a scientific article. To be useful it must be accurate.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of references in the dermatologic literature.
METHODS: We randomly selected 240 references (60 per journal) from the Archives of Dermatology, the British Journal of Dermatology, this Journal, and the Journal of Investigative Dermatology and checked them against the original articles.
RESULTS: The overall rate of citation error (the information identifying the source) was 41%, and the quotation error (inconsistency between the statement referenced and the original source) was 35%. Only 36% of references were free of error.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that the rate of citation and quotation errors is unacceptably high in the dermatologic literature, which significantly diminishes the value of the reference list.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8021373     DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(94)70136-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  6 in total

1.  Accuracy of references in five biomedical informatics journals.

Authors:  Dominik Aronsky; Joel Ransom; Kevin Robinson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  How accurate is the neurosurgery literature? A review of references.

Authors:  Thiago S Montenegro; Kevin Hines; Glenn A Gonzalez; Umma Fatema; Paul P Partyka; Sara Thalheimer; James Harrop
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 3.  Technical editing of research reports in biomedical journals.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wager; Philippa Middleton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

4.  Quotation accuracy in medical journal articles-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hannah Jergas; Christopher Baethge
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 5.  Accuracy of cited "facts" in medical research articles: A review of study methodology and recalculation of quotation error rate.

Authors:  Scott A Mogull
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Quotation Accuracy of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols on Acupuncture.

Authors:  José M Morán; María Romero-Moreno; Azucena Santillán-García; Ivan Herrera-Peco
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.