OBJECTIVE: To compare fetal growth assessed by ultrasound (change in standard deviation score of abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight) during the third trimester with predelivery ultrasound measurements of fetal size and Doppler measurements from the umbilical and fetal arteries in order to predict suboptimal perinatal outcome in small babies at term. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Day assessment unit in a university hospital. SUBJECTS: One hundred and four consecutive women with a clinical suspicion of a small fetus during the third trimester confirmed by ultrasound (abdominal circumference below the 10th centile) and ultimately delivered at term. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Acidaemia at birth, fetal distress requiring emergency caesarean section in labour, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. RESULTS: Ninety-four babies (90%) weighed less than the 10th centile and the incidence of suboptimal perinatal outcome was 27%. The largest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for suboptimal perinatal outcome were obtained with the change in standard deviation score of abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight, and the ratios of aortic/middle cerebral and renal/middle cerebral pulsatility index. Although low, the odds ratios of the change in estimated fetal weight standard deviation score and the Doppler ratios were significantly different from zero. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound assessment of fetal growth and predelivery fetal Doppler pulsatility index ratios were superior to predelivery estimates of fetal size and umbilical artery pulsatility index in predicting suboptimal perinatal outcome in small fetuses delivering at term, although the clinical value of such a prediction may be limited.
OBJECTIVE: To compare fetal growth assessed by ultrasound (change in standard deviation score of abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight) during the third trimester with predelivery ultrasound measurements of fetal size and Doppler measurements from the umbilical and fetal arteries in order to predict suboptimal perinatal outcome in small babies at term. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Day assessment unit in a university hospital. SUBJECTS: One hundred and four consecutive women with a clinical suspicion of a small fetus during the third trimester confirmed by ultrasound (abdominal circumference below the 10th centile) and ultimately delivered at term. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Acidaemia at birth, fetal distress requiring emergency caesarean section in labour, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. RESULTS: Ninety-four babies (90%) weighed less than the 10th centile and the incidence of suboptimal perinatal outcome was 27%. The largest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for suboptimal perinatal outcome were obtained with the change in standard deviation score of abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight, and the ratios of aortic/middle cerebral and renal/middle cerebral pulsatility index. Although low, the odds ratios of the change in estimated fetal weight standard deviation score and the Doppler ratios were significantly different from zero. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound assessment of fetal growth and predelivery fetal Doppler pulsatility index ratios were superior to predelivery estimates of fetal size and umbilical artery pulsatility index in predicting suboptimal perinatal outcome in small fetuses delivering at term, although the clinical value of such a prediction may be limited.
Authors: Nir Melamed; Ahmet Baschat; Yoav Yinon; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Federico Mecacci; Francesc Figueras; Vincenzo Berghella; Amala Nazareth; Muna Tahlak; H David McIntyre; Fabrício Da Silva Costa; Anne B Kihara; Eran Hadar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Mark Hanson; Ronald C Ma; Rachel Gooden; Eyal Sheiner; Anil Kapur; Hema Divakar; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Liran Hiersch; Liona C Poon; John Kingdom; Roberto Romero; Moshe Hod Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: J A Spencer; T C Chang; D Crook; A Proudler; C V Felton; S C Robson; M Hauesler Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 5.747
Authors: Rojan Saghian; Lindsay Cahill; Anum Rahman; Joseph Steinman; Greg Stortz; John Kingdom; Christopher Macgowan; John Sled Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Denise Bijlenga; Kim E Boers; Erwin Birnie; Ben-Willem J Mol; Sylvia C M Vijgen; Joris A M Van der Post; Christianne J De Groot; Robbert J P Rijnders; Paula J Pernet; Frans J Roumen; Rob H Stigter; Friso M C Delemarre; Henk A Bremer; Martina Porath; Sicco A Scherjon; Gouke J Bonsel Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-04-06 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Mark Robert Dilworth; Irene Andersson; Lewis James Renshall; Elizabeth Cowley; Philip Baker; Susan Greenwood; Colin Peter Sibley; Mark Wareing Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kim E Boers; Denise Bijlenga; Ben W J Mol; Saskia LeCessie; Erwin Birnie; Marielle G van Pampus; Rob H Stigter; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp; Claudia A van Meir; Joris A M van der Post; Dick J Bekedam; Lucy S M Ribbert; Addie P Drogtrop; Paulien C M van der Salm; Anjoke J M Huisjes; Christine Willekes; Frans J M E Roumen; Hubertina C J Scheepers; Karin de Boer; Johannes J Duvekot; Jim G Thornton; Sicco A Scherjon Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2007-07-10 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Nathan R Blue; Matthew Hoffman; Amanda A Allshouse; William A Grobman; Hyagriv N Simhan; Ozhan M Turan; Samuel Parry; Judith H Chung; Uma Reddy; David M Haas; Stephen Myers; Brian Mercer; George R Saade; Robert M Silver Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 3.079