Literature DB >> 8017745

Effects of practice style in managing back pain.

M Von Korff1, W Barlow, D Cherkin, R A Deyo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of a practice style of back pain management consistent with self-care (infrequent prescribing of pain medications and bed rest) on long-term functional outcomes, costs of care, and patient satisfaction.
DESIGN: A quasi-experimental observational study in which primary care physicians (n = 44) were categorized according to one of three practice style groups defined by a low, moderate, or high frequency of prescribing pain medications and bed rest for many patients (average, 24 patients per physician).
SETTING: Primary care practices of a large, staff model health maintenance organization, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with back or neck pain of participating primary care physicians. Patients were interviewed 1 month (n = 1071) and 1 year and 2 years (n = 911) after their index visits.
RESULTS: Patients in the three practice style groups rated similarly the quality of medical care received for back pain. Patients treated by physicians who infrequently prescribed pain medications and bed rest were more satisfied with education about back pain. On a scale of 0 to 10, the mean rating of agreement with the statement, "After your visit the doctor, you fully understood how to take care of your back problem," was 5.6 +/- 3.6 among patients of physicians who frequently prescribed medication and rest and was 6.6 +/- 3.5) among those who infrequently prescribed medication and bed rest. At 1 month, 30% of patients of physicians who infrequently prescribed medications and bed rest were graded as having moderate to severe activity limitation because of back pain, whereas 37% of patients in the moderate group had this grading, and 46% of patients of physicians who frequently prescribed were graded as having moderate to severe activity limitation. Differences in activity limitation by practice style group were no longer evident at 1 or 2 years of follow-up. The total 1-year costs of back care were higher among patients seen by physicians who frequently prescribed bed rest and pain medications (cost, $768 +/- $1592) than among those seen by physicians who infrequently prescribed (cost, $428 +/- $665), due largely to differences in inpatient and specialty care costs. The adjusted difference in costs, after controlling for case-mix variables, was $277 (95% Cl, $85.50 to $471.32).
CONCLUSIONS: A practice style consistent with back pain self-care yielded similar long-term pain and functional outcomes at lower cost and was associated with higher satisfaction with patient education compared with a practice style characterized by more frequent prescribing of pain medications and bed rest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8017745     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-3-199408010-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  18 in total

1.  Patterns of sick-leave and health outcomes in injured workers with back pain.

Authors:  Pierre Côté; Marjorie L Baldwin; William G Johnson; John W Frank; Richard J Butler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  An experimental investigation of the relationships among race, prayer, and pain.

Authors:  Samantha M Meints; Catherine Mosher; Kevin L Rand; Leslie Ashburn-Nardo; Adam T Hirsh
Journal:  Scand J Pain       Date:  2018-07-26

3.  The art versus the science of medicine. Are clinical practice guidelines the answer?

Authors:  M E Suarez-Almazor; A S Russell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  Pharmacoeconomics of chronic nonmalignant pain.

Authors:  M J Zagari; P D Mazonson; W C Longton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Are patients' ratings of their physicians related to health outcomes?

Authors:  Peter Franks; Kevin Fiscella; Cleveland G Shields; Sean C Meldrum; Paul Duberstein; Anthony F Jerant; Daniel J Tancredi; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 6.  Evaluating and managing acute low back pain in the primary care setting.

Authors:  S J Atlas; R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  The back pain beliefs of health care providers: are we fear-avoidant?

Authors:  Steven J Linton; Johan Vlaeyen; Raymond Ostelo
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-12

8.  A clinical return-to-work rule for patients with back pain.

Authors:  Clermont E Dionne; Renée Bourbonnais; Pierre Frémont; Michel Rossignol; Susan R Stock; Isabelle Larocque
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Systematic reviews of bed rest and advice to stay active for acute low back pain.

Authors:  G Waddell; G Feder; M Lewis
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Low back pain.

Authors:  Anthony Delitto; Steven Z George; Linda Van Dillen; Julie M Whitman; Gwendolyn Sowa; Paul Shekelle; Thomas R Denninger; Joseph J Godges
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.751

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.