Literature DB >> 8017539

Ethnic differences in midwife-attended US births.

J D Parker1.   

Abstract

This study examined US ethnic differences in midwifery care from 1982 through 1989. After adjustment for maternal characteristics, Native American mothers were most likely, and White and Asian mothers were least likely, to obtain midwifery care. For these three groups, midwifery use increased rapidly in the period from 1982 through 1989. Compared with White mothers, Black and Hispanic mothers were more likely to be attended by a midwife; however, their use of midwives increased more slowly. Though the local availability of obstetricians and midwives may determine a woman's choice of care provider, these data suggest that cultural factors also play a role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8017539      PMCID: PMC1614732          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.84.7.1139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  9 in total

1.  The transformation of American midwifery: 1975 to 1988.

Authors:  E R Declercq
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Effectiveness of certified nurse-midwives. A prospective evaluation study.

Authors:  C Slome; H Wetherbee; M Daly; K Christensen; M Meglen; H Thiede
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-01-15       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Nurse-midwifery practice in the United States, 1982 and 1987.

Authors:  C J Adams
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Certified nurse-midwife effectiveness in the health maintenance organization obstetric team.

Authors:  K E Bell; J I Mills
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Reducing low birth weight among socioeconomically high-risk adolescent pregnancies. Successful intervention with certified nurse-midwife-managed care and a multidisciplinary team.

Authors:  S L Piechnik; M A Corbett
Journal:  J Nurse Midwifery       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr

6.  Reducing neonatal mortality rate with nurse-midwives.

Authors:  B S Levy; F S Wilkinson; W M Marine
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1971-01-01       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Where babies are born and who attends their births: findings from the revised 1989 United States Standard Certificate of Live Birth.

Authors:  E R Declercq
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  The role of selection bias in comparing cesarean birth rates between physician and midwifery management.

Authors:  L R Chambliss; C Daly; A L Medearis; M Ames; M Kayne; R Paul
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  San Francisco General Hospital nurse-midwifery practice: the first thousand births.

Authors:  R J Mann
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-07-15       Impact factor: 8.661

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Midwifery care, social and medical risk factors, and birth outcomes in the USA.

Authors:  M F MacDorman; G K Singh
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Peripartum racial/ethnic disparities.

Authors:  Elizabeth M S Lange; Paloma Toledo
Journal:  Int Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  2021-07-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.