Literature DB >> 8015849

Prognosis of cervical spinal cord injury in correlation with magnetic resonance imaging.

T Sato1, S Kokubun, K P Rijal, T Ojima, N Moriai, M Hashimoto, H Hyodo, H Oonuma.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) images of 18 patients with a cervical spinal cord injury were analysed for prognostic signs of paralysis. Serial MR images were obtained within 48 hours (acute stage), then 2 weeks (subacute stage) and an average of 12 months (range 6-24 months) after injury. The patterns of signal intensity in the acute stage were divided into two types, slightly-low/low (SL/L) type and slightly-low/high (SL/H) type on T1-weighted images (T1WI) and T2-weighted images (T2WI). The patterns in the subacute stage were divided into two types, high/high (H/H) type and normal/high (N/H) type on T1WI and T2WI. Six patients showed SL/L type in the acute stage and H/H type in the subacute stage. Five of the patients had a paralysis of grade A and one of grade B at admission which remained unchanged after treatment. One patient showed SL/H type in the acute stage and H/H type in the subacute stage. The patient had a paralysis of grade A that improved to no more than grade B. The remaining 11 patients showed SL/H type in the acute stage and N/H type in the subacute stage. Their paralysis was from grade B to D at admission and grade D or E at the follow up. The signal intensity of SL/L type in the acute stage and H/H type in the subacute stage are bad prognostic signs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8015849     DOI: 10.1038/sc.1994.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paraplegia        ISSN: 0031-1758


  4 in total

1.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in a naturally occurring canine model of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  J F Griffin; M C Davis; J X Ji; N D Cohen; B D Young; J M Levine
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 2.  Neuroimaging in traumatic spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Daniel Lammertse; David Dungan; James Dreisbach; Scott Falci; Adam Flanders; Ralph Marino; Eric Schwartz
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 3.  Who is going to walk? A review of the factors influencing walking recovery after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Giorgio Scivoletto; Federica Tamburella; Letizia Laurenza; Monica Torre; Marco Molinari
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Quantitative Analysis in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Patients Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Tractography.

Authors:  Geun Seok Park; Tae Uk Kim; Seong Jae Lee; Jung Keun Hyun; Seo Young Kim
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2022-08-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.