Literature DB >> 8010792

Bayesian-logit model for risk assessment in coronary artery bypass grafting.

G Marshall1, A L Shroyer, F L Grover, K E Hammermeister.   

Abstract

Predictive models for the assessment of operative risk using patient risk factors have gained popularity in the medical community as an important tool for the adjustment of surgical outcome. The Bayes' theorem model is among the various models used to predict mortality among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. Comparative studies of the various classic statistical techniques, such as logistic regression, cluster of variables followed by a logistic regression, a subjectively created sickness score, classification trees model, and the Bayes' theorem model, have shown that the Bayes' model is among those with the highest predictive power. In this study, the Bayes' theorem model is reformulated as a logistic equation and extended to include qualitative and quantitative risk factors. We show that the resulting model, the Bayesian-logit model, is a mixture of logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis. This new model can be created easily without complex computer programs. Using 12,712 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting procedures at the Department of Veterans Affairs Continuous Improvement in Cardiac Surgery Study between April 1987 and March 1990, the predictive power of the Bayesian-logit model is compared with the Bayes' theorem model, logistic regression, and discriminant analysis. The ability of the Bayesian-logit model to discriminate between operative deaths and operative survivors is comparable with that of logistic regression and discriminant analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8010792     DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)90107-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  10 in total

1.  Likely variations in perioperative mortality associated with cardiac surgery: when does high mortality reflect bad practice?

Authors:  C Sherlaw-Johnson; J Lovegrove; T Treasure; S Gallivan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Validation of four different risk stratification systems in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a UK multicentre analysis of 2223 patients.

Authors:  S Al-Ruzzeh; G Asimakopoulos; G Ambler; R Omar; R Hasan; B Fabri; A El-Gamel; A DeSouza; V Zamvar; S Griffin; D Keenan; U Trivedi; M Pullan; A Cale; M Cowen; K Taylor; M Amrani
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Public confidence and cardiac surgical outcome. Cardiac surgery: the fall guy in medical quality assurance.

Authors:  B E Keogh; J Dussek; D Watson; P Magee; D Wheatley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-13

4.  Predicting operative risk for coronary artery surgery in the United Kingdom: a comparison of various risk prediction algorithms.

Authors:  B Bridgewater; H Neve; N Moat; T Hooper; M Jones
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Limitations of the Parsonnet score for measuring risk stratified mortality in the north west of England. The North West Regional Cardiac Surgery Audit Steering Group.

Authors:  K Wynne-Jones; M Jackson; G Grotte; B Bridgewater
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Machine learning for predicting cardiac events: what does the future hold?

Authors:  Brijesh Patel; Partho Sengupta
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2020-02-23

7.  A multivariate Bayesian model for assessing morbidity after coronary artery surgery.

Authors:  Bonizella Biagioli; Sabino Scolletta; Gabriele Cevenini; Emanuela Barbini; Pierpaolo Giomarelli; Paolo Barbini
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-07-17       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Retention of work capacity after coronary artery bypass grafting. A 10-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Ville Hällberg; Matti Kataja; Matti Tarkka; Ari Palomäki
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  A comparative analysis of predictive models of morbidity in intensive care unit after cardiac surgery - part I: model planning.

Authors:  Emanuela Barbini; Gabriele Cevenini; Sabino Scolletta; Bonizella Biagioli; Pierpaolo Giomarelli; Paolo Barbini
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  A comparative analysis of predictive models of morbidity in intensive care unit after cardiac surgery - part II: an illustrative example.

Authors:  Gabriele Cevenini; Emanuela Barbini; Sabino Scolletta; Bonizella Biagioli; Pierpaolo Giomarelli; Paolo Barbini
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 2.796

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.