Literature DB >> 8010789

Successful use of undersized donors for orthotopic heart transplantation--with a caveat.

L H Blackbourne1, C G Tribble, S E Langenburg, K N Sinclair, G B Rucker, B B Chan, W D Spotnitz, J D Bergin, I L Kron.   

Abstract

Accepted clinical practice has been to require body weights to be within 20% as a criterion for matching donor to recipient for cardiac transplantation. From November 1989 through September 1993 we began accepting larger differences in body weight between donor and recipient with 80 orthotopic heart transplants performed. Twenty-eight of these transplants used undersized donors (donor-to-recipient body weight ratio [DRBW] of 0.6 to 0.8) with the remaining donors being either size matched (DRBW = 0.8 to 1.0) or oversized (DRBW > 1.0). Thirty-three of the 80 transplant recipients (41%) were classified preoperatively as United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status I and the remaining patients were classified as UNOS status II. Hospital survival for status I recipients was 9 of 14 (64%) for undersized donors, 7 of 8 (87.5%) for sized-matched donors, and 11 of 11 (100%) for oversized donors (p < 0.05). Hospital survival for status II recipients was 12 of 14 (85.7%) for undersized donors, 24 of 24 (100%) for sized-matched donors, and 8 of 9 (88.8%) for oversized donors. Our data support the continued use of hearts from undersized donors in status II recipients. The use of hearts from undersized donors in status I recipients is associated with increased mortality compared with size-matched donors and must be undertaken with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8010789     DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)90103-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  3 in total

1.  The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-sixth adult heart transplantation report - 2019; focus theme: Donor and recipient size match.

Authors:  Kiran K Khush; Wida S Cherikh; Daniel C Chambers; Michael O Harhay; Don Hayes; Eileen Hsich; Bruno Meiser; Luciano Potena; Amanda Robinson; Joseph W Rossano; Aparna Sadavarte; Tajinder P Singh; Andreas Zuckermann; Josef Stehlik
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  Validation of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance-Derived Equation for Predicted Left Ventricular Mass Using the UK Biobank Imaging Cohort: Tool for Donor-Recipient Size Matching.

Authors:  Kenneth Fung; Caitlin Cheshire; Jackie A Cooper; Pedro Catarino; Stefan K Piechnik; Stefan Neubauer; Sai Bhagra; Stephen Pettit; Steffen E Petersen
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 8.790

3.  Status on Heart Transplantation in China.

Authors:  Xing-Jian Hu; Nian-Guo Dong; Jin-Ping Liu; Fei Li; Yong-Feng Sun; Yin Wang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.