Literature DB >> 8010281

MR of the head and neck: comparison of fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo sequences.

R Fulbright1, D Panush, G Sze, R C Smith, R T Constable.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare conspicuousness of head and neck lesions on fast spin-echo sequences and conventional spin-echo sequences.
METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with 61 head and neck lesions were evaluated. Lesion conspicuousness was qualitatively compared on conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo sequences, using both spin-density and T2-weighted images. Thirty-six lesions had surgical or pathologic confirmation, and 25 were assigned a presumptive diagnosis based on clinical evaluation and imaging findings seen on conventional spin-echo T1- and T2-weighted sequences. Forty lesions were related to neoplasms; 21 lesions consisted of infectious, vascular, or inflammatory abnormalities.
RESULTS: Fast spin-echo sequences provided improved lesion conspicuousness in 91% of spin-density images, in 77% of T2-weighted images, and in 84% of the combined spin-density and T2-weighted images.
CONCLUSION: By providing shorter imaging times and equal or superior lesion conspicuousness, long-repetition-time fast spin-echo sequences can replace long-repetition-time conventional spin-echo sequences in evaluation of the head and neck.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8010281      PMCID: PMC8334213     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  3 in total

1.  High-sensitivity coil array for head and neck imaging: technical note.

Authors:  R G Henry; N J Fischbein; W P Dillon; D B Vigneron; S J Nelson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Imaging of the oropharynx and oral cavity. Part II: Pathology.

Authors:  M Lenz; R Hermans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Dynamic snapshot gradient-echo imaging of head and neck malignancies: time dependency and quality of contrast-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  C Gückel; K Schnabel; M Deimling; W Steinbrich
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.310

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.