Literature DB >> 8009594

Recipient risk factors have an impact on technical failure and patient and graft survival rates in bladder-drained pancreas transplants.

R W Gruessner1, D L Dunn, A C Gruessner, A J Matas, J S Najarian, D E Sutherland.   

Abstract

Recipient selection criteria for pancreas (Px) transplantation differ among centers, based on perceived recipient risk factors, and their validity has not been determined. At the University of Minnesota we have been very liberal in accepting patients for Tx, some of whom have risk factors cited as exclusion criteria by other centers, giving us the opportunity to determine, retrospectively, the impact of their presence on outcome. Between July 1986 and March 1993, we performed 319 bladder-drained cadaver Px Txs at the University of Minnesota, 166 simultaneous with a kidney (SPK), 68 after a kidney (PAK), and 85 alone (PTA). To determine which putative "risk factors" influence patient and graft survival, we used uni- and multivariate (Cox regression) analyses to assess the impact of recipient category, duration of diabetes, and age at onset and at Tx; presence of pre-Tx cardiac (CD) disease (myocardial infarction, bypass, angioplasty), peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (stroke, bypass, angioplasty, amputation); blindness, hypertension, and excess weight; and of Px re-Txs. The incidences of all risk factors except re-Tx were significantly higher in SPK than PTA recipients. Px re-Txs comprised 40% of PAK, 26% of PTA, and 10% of SPK cases (P < 0.0001). Duration of diabetes correlated (P < or = 0.01) with all risk factors but one (hypertension). Recipient age correlated (P < or = 0.01) with CD, blindness, duration of diabetes, and age at onset of diabetes; CD risk factors correlated (P < 0.015) with hypertension and PVD. Recipient age (> or = 45) influenced the technical failure rate only in SPK recipients, with a relative risk (RR) of 2.13 (P = 0.08). Recipient age influenced Px graft and patient survival rates in both SPK and PAK recipients; for those > or = 45, the RR of graft loss was 1.73 and 1.76, respectively (P < or = 0.25), and the RR for ultimately dying was 3.07 in PAK (P = 0.02) and 5.86 in SPK (P = 0.17) recipients. SPK recipients with CD factors were at higher risk to ultimately die (RR = 3.78, P = 0.009), independent of age. Px re-Txs were not at higher risk to fail in PTA, but were in PAK recipients (RR = 1.86, P = 0.09); the risk for technical failure was higher for re-Txs only in SPK recipients (RR = 2.11, P = 0.24). Blindness, hypertension, PVD, and duration of diabetes did not negatively influence patient and graft outcome in any recipient category.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8009594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  9 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-informed clinical practice recommendations for treatment of type 1 diabetes complicated by problematic hypoglycemia.

Authors:  Pratik Choudhary; Michael R Rickels; Peter A Senior; Marie-Christine Vantyghem; Paola Maffi; Thomas W Kay; Bart Keymeulen; Nobuya Inagaki; Frantisek Saudek; Roger Lehmann; Bernhard J Hering
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Lessons learned from more than 1,000 pancreas transplants at a single institution.

Authors:  D E Sutherland; R W Gruessner; D L Dunn; A J Matas; A Humar; R Kandaswamy; S M Mauer; W R Kennedy; F C Goetz; R P Robertson; A C Gruessner; J S Najarian
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Surgical complications requiring early relaparotomy after pancreas transplantation: a multivariate risk factor and economic impact analysis of the cyclosporine era.

Authors:  C Troppmann; A C Gruessner; D L Dunn; D E Sutherland; R W Gruessner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Influence of donor- and recipient-specific factors on the postoperative course after combined pancreas-kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Peter Thomas Fellmer; Andreas Pascher; Andreas Kahl; Frank Ulrich; Katharina Lanzenberger; Konstanze Schnell; Sven Jonas; Stefan G Tullius; Peter Neuhaus; Johann Pratschke
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Decreased surgical risks of pancreas transplantation in the modern era.

Authors:  A Humar; R Kandaswamy; D Granger; R W Gruessner; A C Gruessner; D E Sutherland
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation from live donors.

Authors:  R W Gruessner; D M Kendall; M B Drangstveit; A C Gruessner; D E Sutherland
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Living donor kidney versus simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant in type I diabetics: an analysis of the OPTN/UNOS database.

Authors:  Brian Y Young; Jagbir Gill; Edmund Huang; Steven K Takemoto; Bishoy Anastasi; Tariq Shah; Suphamai Bunnapradist
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Graft Duodenal Perforation due to Internal Hernia after Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation: Report of a Case.

Authors:  Yuichi Fumimoto; Masahiro Tanemura; Yoshihiko Hoshida; Toshirou Nishida; Yoshiki Sawa; Toshinori Ito
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07-24

9.  Pancreas transplantation: a single-institution experience in Japan.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Okabe; Hidehisa Kitada; Yoshifumi Miura; Takehiro Nishiki; Kei Kurihara; Sayako Kawanami; Soshi Terasaka; Keizo Kaku; Hiroshi Noguchi; Atsushi Sugitani; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.549

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.