Literature DB >> 8008552

Modifications of the Poggendorff effect as a function of random dot textures between the verticals.

R Masini1, T Costa, M Ferraro, A De Marco.   

Abstract

In the present research, we investigated the modification of the strength of the Poggendorff illusion as a function of different densities of random dot textures filling the space between the verticals. The results of Experiment 1 show that the illusory effect is a nonlinear function of the texture parameter r, the ratio of black pixels to white and black pixels, with a minimum for r = 0.5, approximately, and a maximum for r = 0 and r = 1. The results may be interpreted by an analytical model of perceptual space dynamics, in which the effect depends on the amount of interaction between points of different light intensity. A computer simulation performed by applying the analytical model to different values of r shows a good agreement between the predictions and the experimental data. To test the hypothesis underlying the model, a second experiment was carried out to measure the magnitude of the expansion of the space between the verticals as a function of the parameter r. The results are consistent with the hypothesis of the model. The overall data are discussed in terms of their implications on various theories proposed for the Poggendorff illusion.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8008552     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  30 in total

1.  The Poggendorff Illusion and estimates of transverse extent.

Authors:  D C Finlay; T M Caelli
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1975-08

2.  The orientation of a parallel-line texture between the verticals can modify the strength of the Poggendorff illusion.

Authors:  R Masini; R Sciaky; A Pascarella
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-09

3.  Use of segment arrays to evaluate the strength of angular induction.

Authors:  E Greene; S al-Quaddoomi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-03

4.  The relative contribution of contact and target lines in the magnitude of the Poggendorff effect.

Authors:  E Greene
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Variations in size judgements as a function of surface texture.

Authors:  C V Newman
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Effect of blurring on perception of a simple geometric pattern.

Authors:  L Glass
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-12-26       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Mistracking in alignment illusions.

Authors:  W H Hotopf
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  False perspectives.

Authors:  B Gillam
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Illusions of filled lateral and angular extent. The role of cortical feature detectors.

Authors:  I Rentschler; R Hilz; C Sütterlin; K Noguchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Bending the Poggendorff parallels and the rules of inference: a note on Brigell and Uhlarik (1980).

Authors:  P Wenderoth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  Biases and sensitivities in the Poggendorff effect when driven by subjective contours.

Authors:  Marc S Tibber; Dean R Melmoth; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The Effects of Adding Pictorial Depth Cues to the Poggendorff Illusion.

Authors:  Gizem Y Yildiz; Bailey G Evans; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-18

3.  Applying Emmert's Law to the Poggendorff illusion.

Authors:  Umur Talasli; Asli Bahar Inan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.