Literature DB >> 8003263

Measuring pain in pediatric oncology ICU patients.

N West1, L Oakes, P S Hinds, L Sanders, R Holden, S Williams, D Fairclough, P Bozeman.   

Abstract

Thirty patients (ages 5 to 13) hospitalized in a pediatric oncology intensive care unit (ICU) rated the presence and severity of their pain on the Faces Pain Scale (FPS) and the Poker Chip Tool (PCT). Parents independently rated the child's pain on these scales and each patient's nurse completed the Objective Pain Scale (OPS). Patients' ratings on the FPS correlated significantly with parents' ratings on this scale (tau = .48, P = .002) but not on the PCT (tau = .23, P = .16). Nurses' ratings on the OPS were moderately correlated with patients' FPS ratings (tau = .37, P = .02) but were only weakly associated with PCT ratings (tau = .27, P = .09). The majority of patients, parents, and nurses expressed a preference for the FPS over the PCT. The FPS appears to be a clinically useful and accurate approach for measuring the pain of pediatric oncology patients in an ICU but is limited to those who can participate in a self-report measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8003263     DOI: 10.1177/104345429401100205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Oncol Nurs        ISSN: 1043-4542            Impact factor:   1.636


  8 in total

1.  Liposomal lidocaine to improve procedural success rates and reduce procedural pain among children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anna Taddio; Herpreet Kaur Soin; Suzanne Schuh; Gideon Koren; Dennis Scolnik
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Postoperative self-report of pain in children: interscale agreement, response to analgesic, and preference for a faces scale and a visual analogue scale.

Authors:  Clément de Tovar; Carl L von Baeyer; Chantal Wood; Jean-Pierre Alibeu; Malik Houfani; Charles Arvieux
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.037

3.  Enhancing validity, reliability and participation in self-reported health outcome measurement for children and young people: a systematic review of recall period, response scale format, and administration modality.

Authors:  L Coombes; K Bristowe; C Ellis-Smith; J Aworinde; L K Fraser; J Downing; M Bluebond-Langner; L Chambers; F E M Murtagh; R Harding
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Assessment of post-operative pain in children: who knows best?

Authors:  Anjalee Brahmbhatt; Tope Adeloye; Ari Ercole; Steven M Bishop; Helen L Smith; Daniel W Wheeler
Journal:  Pediatr Rep       Date:  2012-03-01

5.  Reducing pain in children with cancer: Methodology for the development of a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Erik A H Loeffen; Leontien C M Kremer; Marianne D van de Wetering; Renée L Mulder; Anna Font-Gonzalez; Lee L Dupuis; Fiona Campbell; Wim J E Tissing
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.838

6.  MiYoga: a randomised controlled trial of a mindfulness movement programme based on hatha yoga principles for children with cerebral palsy: a study protocol.

Authors:  Catherine Mak; Koa Whittingham; Ross Cunnington; Roslyn N Boyd
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Adrienne Yl Chan; Mengqin Ge; Emily Harrop; Margaret Johnson; Kate Oulton; Simon S Skene; Ian Ck Wong; Liz Jamieson; Richard F Howard; Christina Liossi
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.762

8.  Consistency of pediatric pain ratings between dyads: an updated meta-analysis and metaregression.

Authors:  Huaqiong Zhou; Matthew A Albrecht; Pam A Roberts; Paul Porter; Phillip R Della
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2022-09-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.