BACKGROUND: The potential benefits of installing excreta disposal facilities on the burden of paediatric diarrhoea in less-developed settings remain controversial. We conducted a longitudinal study to evaluate whether family latrines are associated with interruption of the transmission of shigellosis to younger children in rural Bangladesh. METHODS: We prospectively studied 1529 children under 5 years of age exposed to index cases of Shigella dysentery. In all 219 children with culture-proven shigellosis detected during 1 month of follow-up were compared with 1310 control children who did not develop shigellosis or Shigella-negative dysentery. RESULTS: Overall, the presence of a family latrine appeared to be associated with a higher, not a lower, risk of paediatric shigellosis (adjusted odds ratio (ORa) = 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99-1.89). While use of a pit or sanitary latrine revealed no evidence of a protective association (ORa = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.43-2.15), use of a hanging latrine in which faeces were discharged directly onto the ground or into a body of water was associated with a notable increase of risk (ORa = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02-1.98, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: While cautioning that installation of sanitary latrines may not be sufficient to reduce the burden of paediatric shigellosis in less-developed settings, these data suggest that eliminating unsanitary latrines constitutes a potentially important intervention in its own right in these settings.
BACKGROUND: The potential benefits of installing excreta disposal facilities on the burden of paediatric diarrhoea in less-developed settings remain controversial. We conducted a longitudinal study to evaluate whether family latrines are associated with interruption of the transmission of shigellosis to younger children in rural Bangladesh. METHODS: We prospectively studied 1529 children under 5 years of age exposed to index cases of Shigella dysentery. In all 219 children with culture-proven shigellosis detected during 1 month of follow-up were compared with 1310 control children who did not develop shigellosis or Shigella-negative dysentery. RESULTS: Overall, the presence of a family latrine appeared to be associated with a higher, not a lower, risk of paediatric shigellosis (adjusted odds ratio (ORa) = 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99-1.89). While use of a pit or sanitary latrine revealed no evidence of a protective association (ORa = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.43-2.15), use of a hanging latrine in which faeces were discharged directly onto the ground or into a body of water was associated with a notable increase of risk (ORa = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02-1.98, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: While cautioning that installation of sanitary latrines may not be sufficient to reduce the burden of paediatric shigellosis in less-developed settings, these data suggest that eliminating unsanitary latrines constitutes a potentially important intervention in its own right in these settings.
Entities:
Keywords:
Age Factors; Asia; Bangladesh; Biology; Child; Demographic Factors; Developing Countries; Diarrhea--transmission; Diseases; Geographic Factors; Health; Housing; Hygiene; Longitudinal Studies; Population; Population Characteristics; Public Health; Research Report; Residence Characteristics; Risk Factors; Rural Population; Sanitation; Southern Asia; Spatial Distribution; Studies; Youth
Authors: A I Khan; K A Talukder; S Huq; D Mondal; M A Malek; D K Dutta; G B Nair; A S G Faruque Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2005-11-17 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: Joseph N S Eisenberg; James Trostle; Reed J D Sorensen; Katherine F Shields Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: F Ferdous; S Ahmed; F D Farzana; J Das; M A Malek; S K Das; M A Salam; A S G Faruque Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 4.434
Authors: Wilfredo R Matias; Jessica E Teng; Isabelle J Hilaire; Jason B Harris; Molly F Franke; Louise C Ivers Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 2.345