Literature DB >> 8002191

The relation between psychosocial job strain, and preterm delivery and low birthweight for gestational age.

T B Henriksen1, M Hedegaard, N J Secher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the relationship between psychosocial job demands and job control during pregnancy and risk of small-for-gestational age (SGA) and preterm delivery.
METHODS: We studied 8711 Danish women with singleton pregnancies between 1989 and 1991. Information about medical and obstetric history, general psychosocial and lifestyle factors and occupational exposures were collected at 16 weeks gestation. The analyses were restricted to 3503 respondents who worked at least 30 hours per week during the first trimester. The women's scores on both the job demand and job control questionnaire were initially dichotomized at the median score, and combined into four exposure categories: relaxed jobs (low demands and high control), active jobs (high demands and high control), passive jobs (low demands and low control), and high-strain jobs (high demands and low control).
RESULTS: After adjustment for confounders, women with relaxed jobs had the lowest risk of SGA and preterm delivery. Compared to this group the odds ratio (OR) for SGA delivery among women with passive jobs was 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9-1.9), with high-strain jobs 1.1 (95% CI: 0.7-1.6), and with active jobs 1.1 (95% CI: 0.8-1.7). Compared to women with relaxed jobs, the OR for preterm delivery among women with passive jobs was 1.4 (95% CI: 0.8-2.3), high-strain jobs 1.3 (95% CI: 0.7-2.2) and active jobs 1.2 (95% CI: 0.7-2.2). All risks were consistently increased in women with low job control. The risks were higher for preterm than for SGA deliveries. However, none of the findings were statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The influence of work-related psychosocial strain on the risk of SGA and preterm delivery seems to be small in countries with highly developed social support systems and few other work-related hazards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8002191     DOI: 10.1093/ije/23.4.764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  22 in total

1.  Socioeconomic inequality in birth outcomes: what do the indicators tell us, and where do we find the data?

Authors:  Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen; Laust H Mortensen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Association of maternal work with adverse perinatal outcome.

Authors:  Mostafa A Arafa; Taher Amine; Moataz Abdel Fattah
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2007 May-Jun

3.  Occupational predictors of pregnancy outcomes in Irish working women in the Lifeways cohort.

Authors:  I Niedhammer; D O'Mahony; S Daly; J J Morrison; C C Kelleher
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Preterm birth and prenatal maternal occupation: the role of Hispanic ethnicity and nativity in a population-based sample in Los Angeles, California.

Authors:  Ondine S von Ehrenstein; Michelle Wilhelm; Anthony Wang; Beate Ritz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  The use of psychosocial stress scales in preterm birth research.

Authors:  Melissa J Chen; William A Grobman; Jackie K Gollan; Ann E B Borders
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Paternal work stress and prolonged time to pregnancy.

Authors:  Mi-Sun Lee; Domyung Paek; Ki-Do Eum; Johannes Siegrist; Jian Li; Hye-Eun Lee; Sung-Il Cho
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Adverse pregnancy outcomes in healthcare workers: a Korean nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Chulyong Park; Mo-Yeol Kang; Dohyung Kim; Jaechan Park; Huisu Eom; Eun-A Kim
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Socioeconomic and work related determinants of pregnancy outcome in southern Thailand.

Authors:  P Tuntiseranee; J Olsen; V Chongsuvivatwong; S Limbutara
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Employment, working conditions, and preterm birth: results from the Europop case-control survey.

Authors:  M J Saurel-Cubizolles; J Zeitlin; N Lelong; E Papiernik; G C Di Renzo; G Bréart
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Physical activity and risk of small-for-gestational-age birth among predominantly Puerto Rican women.

Authors:  Audra L Gollenberg; Penelope Pekow; Elizabeth R Bertone-Johnson; Patty S Freedson; Glenn Markenson; Lisa Chasan-Taber
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.