Literature DB >> 8002093

Multicenter evaluation of a novel quantification method for rubella and toxoplasmosis antibodies.

B Martens-Düring1, H D Dopatka.   

Abstract

Antibody quantification by EIA is possible without a standard curve. Following the so-called alpha method only one test dilution is used, the resulting absorbance is corrected and the IU/ml will be calculated by means of a mathematical formula. This new kind of a single point measurement was evaluated in seven independent laboratories by comparison with commercial EIAs using a standard curve or a titer calibration line. For the quantification of IgG against rubella virus this study comprised 1,480 individual samples and three comparison EIAs. For IgG against Toxoplasma gondii a total of 743 samples was evaluated in two comparison tests. The results obtained by the alpha method show a precision and accuracy more than sufficient for routine testings. Also the technical expenses and reagent costs were reduced. Prerequisites and limitations are discussed against the background of the problem of immune status definition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8002093     DOI: 10.1007/BF01739924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  13 in total

1.  Single point quantification of antibody by ELISA without need of a reference curve.

Authors:  H D Dopatka; B Giesendorf
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Evaluation of a simple method for improving the precision of an ELISA detecting antibody in serum.

Authors:  R J Whittington
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1992-04-08       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Multicenter evaluation of five commercial rubella virus immunoglobulin G kits which report in international units per milliliter.

Authors:  W Dimech; A Bettoli; D Eckert; B Francis; J Hamblin; T Kerr; C Ryan; I Skurrie
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Stepless antibody determination with the stick-ELISA technique. Results expressed as multiple of normal activity (MONA).

Authors:  P Felgner
Journal:  Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A       Date:  1978-11

5.  How well do low levels of rubella antibody protect?

Authors:  S O'Shea; G Parsons; J M Best; J E Banatvala; H H Balfour
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-12-05       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Discriminant analysis of data in enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  S M Kramer; N P Jewell; N E Cremer
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1983-05-27       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for quantitation of toxoplasma antibodies in human sera.

Authors:  A M van Loon; J van der Veen
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  The communication of ELISA data from laboratory to clinician.

Authors:  D de Savigny; A Voller
Journal:  J Immunoassay       Date:  1980

9.  Are many women immunized against rubella unnecessarily?

Authors:  P P Mortimer; J M Edwards; A D Porter; R S Tedder; J E Mace; A Hutchinson
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1981-08

10.  Rubella immunity by four different techniques: results of challenge studies.

Authors:  J M Best; G C Harcourt; A Druce; S J Palmer; S O'Shea; J E Banatvala
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.