Literature DB >> 8002068

Liver transplantation from living related donors: review of world experience and its implications for India.

V Bhatnagar1, M Rela, N D Heaton, K C Tan.   

Abstract

Living related liver transplantation (LRLT) was made possible because of a better understanding of the anatomy of the liver and advances made in hepatic surgical techniques. It was developed to reduce the waiting period for pediatric recipients. In countries like Japan, which do not have brain stem death legislation, LRLT is the only modality available for treating end stage liver disease. The world experience has shown that LRLT has been successfully performed in a variety of conditions leading to acute and chronic liver failure not only in children, but in young adults as well. The initial results of LRLT appear to be better than liver transplantation from cadaveric organs in terms of graft survival and function. Donor safety has been of prime concern. LRLT has tremendous potential in India with or without the brain stem death legislation. Liver transplantation has not been performed in India although the need and expertise for it exists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8002068     DOI: 10.1007/BF02751897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Pediatr        ISSN: 0019-5456            Impact factor:   1.967


  28 in total

1.  Segmental living liver transplantation in children and adults.

Authors:  M Haberal; N Buyukpamukcu; H Telatar; N Bilgin; G Arslan; H Simsek; E Ekici; M Karamehmetoglu
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  New devices for harvesting a hepatic graft from a living donor.

Authors:  Y Yamaoka; K Ozawa; A Tanaka; K Mori; T Morimoto; Y Shimahara; M Zaima; K Tanaka; K Kumada
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Must I be my brother's keeper? Ethical issues in the use of living donors as sources of liver and other solid organs.

Authors:  A Caplan
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Living donor hepatectomy in partial liver transplantation: surgical technique and results.

Authors:  M Haberal; N Bilgin; N Büyükpamukcu; R Tokyay; H Telatar; H Simsek; G Aslan; B Uzunalimoglu; E Ekici; A Besim
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Liver transplantation in children from living-related donors.

Authors:  K Tanaka; S Uemoto; Y Tokunaga; S Fujita; K Sano; K Mori; Y Yamaoka; K Ozawa
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 6.  Living related donors for liver transplants.

Authors:  C E Broelsch; D M Lloyd
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  1993

7.  Improved results of living-related liver transplantation with routine application in a pediatric program.

Authors:  J C Emond; T G Heffron; E O Kortz; R Gonzalez-Vallina; J C Contis; D D Black; P F Whitington
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  An appraisal of pediatric liver transplantation from living relatives. Initial clinical experiences in 20 pediatric liver transplantations from living relatives as donors.

Authors:  K Ozawa; S Uemoto; K Tanaka; K Kumada; Y Yamaoka; N Kobayashi; T Inamoto; Y Shimahara; K Mori; K Honda
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Partial liver transplantation from living related donors.

Authors:  H Kawarasaki; M Makuuchi; S Ishisone; T Iwanaka; K Hashizume; S Kawasaki; H Matsunami
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.066

10.  Surgical techniques and innovations in living related liver transplantation.

Authors:  K Tanaka; S Uemoto; Y Tokunaga; S Fujita; K Sano; T Nishizawa; H Sawada; I Shirahase; H J Kim; Y Yamaoka
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pediatric liver transplantation: the Indian perspective.

Authors:  V Bhatnagar
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.967

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.