R H Bailey1, J H Bauer, J Yanos. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia 65212.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the initial accuracy, drift in calibration over several hours, and decline in accuracy over daily use of blood pressure transducers used in the critical care setting. DESIGN: Prospective, criterion standard. SETTING: Three critical care units in a university hospital. SUBJECTS: Twenty-seven consecutively available high-pressure transducers were used to measure intra-arterial blood pressures, and 11 consecutively available low-pressure transducers were used to measure central venous and pulmonary arterial blood pressures. INTERVENTIONS: High-pressure transducers were compared with a mercury column manometer, and low-pressure transducers were compared with a water column manometer at three pressure levels. Data were collected initially after installation of the pressure transducer, at 3 hrs, and at 6 hrs. Data collections were repeated on subsequent days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: a) The majority of pressure transducers are accurate; b) there is no drift in the accuracy of pressure transducers over several hours; c) the accuracy of pressure transducers does not decline over subsequent days. Some transducers over-estimated standard pressures by 10 mm Hg and/or underestimated standard pressure by 17 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of pressure transducers used in the critical care setting are accurate, although there are some transducers that may compromise patient care. Blood pressure transducers should be checked against a standard manometer upon installation, and daily during use.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the initial accuracy, drift in calibration over several hours, and decline in accuracy over daily use of blood pressure transducers used in the critical care setting. DESIGN: Prospective, criterion standard. SETTING: Three critical care units in a university hospital. SUBJECTS: Twenty-seven consecutively available high-pressure transducers were used to measure intra-arterial blood pressures, and 11 consecutively available low-pressure transducers were used to measure central venous and pulmonary arterial blood pressures. INTERVENTIONS: High-pressure transducers were compared with a mercury column manometer, and low-pressure transducers were compared with a water column manometer at three pressure levels. Data were collected initially after installation of the pressure transducer, at 3 hrs, and at 6 hrs. Data collections were repeated on subsequent days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: a) The majority of pressure transducers are accurate; b) there is no drift in the accuracy of pressure transducers over several hours; c) the accuracy of pressure transducers does not decline over subsequent days. Some transducers over-estimated standard pressures by 10 mm Hg and/or underestimated standard pressure by 17 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of pressure transducers used in the critical care setting are accurate, although there are some transducers that may compromise patient care. Blood pressure transducers should be checked against a standard manometer upon installation, and daily during use.
Authors: Stefano Romagnoli; Zaccaria Ricci; Diego Quattrone; Lorenzo Tofani; Omar Tujjar; Gianluca Villa; Salvatore M Romano; A Raffaele De Gaudio Journal: Crit Care Date: 2014-11-30 Impact factor: 9.097