Literature DB >> 8000645

Assessment of five-year experience with abdominal organ cluster transplantation.

M Alessiani1, A Tzakis, S Todo, A J Demetris, J J Fung, T E Starzl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Upper abdominal exenteration (resection of the liver, stomach, spleen, pancreaticoduodenal complex, and part of the colon) for the treatment of otherwise unresectable tumors is one of the more radical operations in oncology. This study was done to analyze retrospectively a five-year experience with exenteration in 57 patients treated with variations of resectional and transplant reconstructive techniques. STUDY
DESIGN: Sixty-one transplantations were performed upon 57 patients. Three different organ replacement techniques were used: liver-pancreas-duodenum en bloc (original procedure), liver only (modified procedure), and liver plus pancreatic islets. The diagnoses were cholangiocarcinoma (20 patients), hepatocellular carcinoma (12 patients), endocrine neoplasms (14 patients), sarcoma (six patients), and adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (two patients), colon (two patients), or gallbladder (one patient). Analyses of survival and tumor recurrence were stratified by procedure variations, type and extent of tumor, and immunosuppressive regimen.
RESULTS: The three month and one, two, three, and five year actuarial patient survival rates were 82, 56, 38, 33, and 30 percent, respectively. Eighteen (31.5 percent) of the 57 patients are alive after 425 15 (standard deviation) months (range of 17 to 61 months) and 12 patients are tumor free. The actuarial survival rates stratified by transplantation procedure, immunosuppression, and tumor diagnosis and extent showed no statistically significant differences beyond the three different transplantation groups. Endocrine tumors had a better three-year survival rate (64 percent) than sarcoma (44 percent), hepatocellular carcinoma (25 percent), cholangiocarcinoma (20 percent), and the other adenocarcinomas (20 percent). Twenty-three patients (40 percent) died as a result of tumor recurrence. Patients with combined factors of no lymph node involvement, absence of vascular invasion, and metastases to the liver only (11 patients) had the lowest incidence of recurrence (27 compared to 73.5 percent, p = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with unresectable endocrine neoplasms, fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma, and selected cholangiocarcinoma confined to the liver can benefit from this radical operative approach. Patients with sarcoma can achieve long survival periods but have a high recurrence rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8000645      PMCID: PMC2728058     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  18 in total

1.  Long survival in rats after multivisceral versus isolated small-bowel allotransplantation under FK 506.

Authors:  N Murase; A J Demetris; T Matsuzaki; A Yagihashi; S Todo; J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Upper-abdominal exenteration in transplantation for extensive malignancies of the upper abdomen--an update.

Authors:  A G Tzakis; S Todo; J Madariaga; E Tzoracoeleftherakis; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Upper abdominal exenteration with liver replacement: a modification of the "cluster" procedure.

Authors:  A G Tzakis; S Todo; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Treatment of upper abdominal malignancies with organ cluster procedures.

Authors:  L Mieles; S Todo; A Tzakis; T E Starzl
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 5.  Cell migration and chimerism after whole-organ transplantation: the basis of graft acceptance.

Authors:  T E Starzl; A J Demetris; M Trucco; N Murase; C Ricordi; S Ildstad; H Ramos; S Todo; A Tzakis; J J Fung
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Donor selection and surgical technique for en bloc liver-small bowel graft procurement.

Authors:  A Casavilla; R Selby; K Abu-Elmagd; A Tzakis; S Todo; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 7.  The many faces of multivisceral transplantation.

Authors:  T E Starzl; S Todo; A Tzakis; M Alessiani; A Casavilla; K Abu-Elmagd; J J Fung
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1991-05

8.  Replacement of donor lymphoid tissue in small-bowel transplants.

Authors:  Y Iwaki; T E Starzl; A Yagihashi; S Taniwaki; K Abu-Elmagd; A Tzakis; J Fung; S Todo
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-04-06       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Intestinal transplantation in composite visceral grafts or alone.

Authors:  S Todo; A G Tzakis; K Abu-Elmagd; J Reyes; K Nakamura; A Casavilla; R Selby; B M Nour; H Wright; J J Fung
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Pancreatic islet transplantation after upper abdominal exenteration and liver replacement.

Authors:  A G Tzakis; C Ricordi; R Alejandro; Y Zeng; J J Fung; S Todo; A J Demetris; D H Mintz; T E Starzl
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-08-18       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  34 in total

1.  Indications for referral and assessment in adult liver transplantation: a clinical guideline. British Society of Gastroenterology.

Authors:  J Devlin; J O'Grady
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Review article: surgical, neo-adjuvant and adjuvant management strategies in biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  J R A Skipworth; S W M Olde Damink; C Imber; J Bridgewater; S P Pereira; M Malagó
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 3.  [Liver transplantation for hilar cholangiocarcinoma].

Authors:  F Rauchfuss; F Utess; S Schüle; Y Dittmar; H Scheuerlein; U Settmacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Treatment of fibrolamellar hepatoma with subtotal hepatectomy or transplantation.

Authors:  A D Pinna; S Iwatsuki; R G Lee; S Todo; J R Madariaga; J W Marsh; A Casavilla; I Dvorchik; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 5.  Liver transplantation for metastatic neuroendocrine tumor: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Wojciech C Blonski; K Rajender Reddy; Abraham Shaked; Evan Siegelman; David C Metz
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Liver transplantation for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors: Outcomes and prognostic variables.

Authors:  Linda S Sher; David M Levi; Julie S Wecsler; Mary Lo; Lydia M Petrovic; Susan Groshen; Lingyun Ji; Teresa Diago Uso; A Joseph Tector; Ann S Hamilton; J Wallis Marsh; Myron E Schwartz
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 7.  Liver transplantation for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ricardo Robles; Francisco Sánchez-Bueno; Pablo Ramírez; Roberto Brusadin; Pascual Parrilla
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Simultaneous pancreatectomy and liver transplantation: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Rajeev Dhupar; Michael E de Vera; J Wallis Marsh; Paulo A Fontes; Jennifer L Steel; Herbert J Zeh; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Proceed with caution: liver transplantation for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  S J Knechtle; M Kalayoglu; A M D'Alessandro; L F Rikkers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Hepatic resection for metastatic gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: outcome and prognostic predictors.

Authors:  D Gomez; H Z Malik; A Al-Mukthar; K V Menon; G J Toogood; J P A Lodge; K R Prasad
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.