Literature DB >> 8000482

Evaluating a patient satisfaction survey for maximum benefit.

V T Dull1, D Lansky, N Davis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction surveys are now in use in some form at most hospitals and health care systems. Yet, it is unclear how well information collected meets the needs of all groups who might benefit from patient feedback. An evaluation was conducted at the Center for Outcomes Research, Sisters of Providence Health System (Portland, Ore), to determine the extent to which the survey, then almost three years in use, was satisfying its internal consumers and to guide redesign of the entire survey process.
METHOD: The evaluation of the survey process was designed to address several questions: who uses the results (consumers); what are their objectives (goals); what results are useful (product); and what is done with the results (intervention utility). Techniques such as interviews, literature reviews, and supplemental data collection, were used to explore the needs of each consumer group.
CONCLUSION: The evaluation has led to a number of changes in the patient satisfaction survey process. Large-scale patient satisfaction surveys result in large-scale costs and therefore must be beneficial to multiple users in multiple ways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8000482     DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30089-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv        ISSN: 1070-3241


  4 in total

1.  Patient assessments of hospital maternity care: a useful tool for consumers?

Authors:  B S Finkelstein; D L Harper; G E Rosenthal
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Review of the literature on survey instruments used to collect data on hospital patients' perceptions of care.

Authors:  Nicholas G Castle; Julie Brown; Kimberly A Hepner; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Are older patients more satisfied with hospital care than younger patients?

Authors:  C Komal Jaipaul; Gary E Rosenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Patient satisfaction in the ambulatory setting. Influence of data collection methods and sociodemographic factors.

Authors:  L H Harpole; E J Orav; M Hickey; K E Posther; T A Brennan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.128

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.