Literature DB >> 8000198

CSF, sagittal sinus, and jugular venous pressures during desflurane or isoflurane anesthesia in dogs.

A A Artru1, K Powers, P Doepfner.   

Abstract

Previous studies to determine whether desflurane increases cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure are inconclusive because none have included all of the following: multiple doses of desflurane, administration for at least several hours, examination at normo- and hypocapnia, a concurrent comparison group, direct measurement of both intra- and extracranial CSF pressures, and measurement of venous pressures that influence CSF pressure. The present study was designed to determine whether CSF pressure increases during 4.0 h desflurane anesthesia using a study design that included the above elements. Catheters were placed in the lateral cerebral ventricle, cisterna magna, sagittal sinus, and jugular vein of 12 dogs anesthetized with thiopental 12 mg.kg-1.h-1 and halothane 0.5 to 0.8%. Catheter pressures were measured, and the CSF-sagittal sinus pressure gradient and slope of the gradient to CSF pressure relationship were determined during control conditions. Then, 6 dogs were anesthetized with desflurane and 6 dogs were anesthetized with isoflurane, and the same values were determined for 1.0 h at each of four experimental conditions: 0.5 and 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) during normocapnia (PaCO2 35-39 mm Hg) and 0.5 and 1.0 MAC during hypocapnia (PaCO2 20-24 mm Hg). CSF and sagittal sinus pressures, but not jugular venous pressure, increased with both desflurane and isoflurane. The greater increase of CSF pressure with 4.0 h desflurane (to 40.2 +/- 12.7 cm H2O) than with 4.0 h isoflurane (to 26.2 +/- 11.5 cm H2O) was attributable to an increase of CSF pressure that was greater during 2.0 h desflurane and normocapnia than during 2.0 h isoflurane and normocapnia, and to an increase of CSF pressure during 2.0 h desflurane and hypocapnia that was similar to that during 2.0 h isoflurane and hypocapnia. The greater increase of CSF pressure during desflurane may have resulted, in part, from increased CSF volume as indicated by a positive CSF-sagittal sinus pressure gradient (in contrast, there was little or no CSF-sagittal sinus pressure gradient during isoflurane) and a steeper slope of the gradient to CSF pressure relationship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8000198     DOI: 10.1097/00008506-199410000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol        ISSN: 0898-4921            Impact factor:   3.956


  5 in total

1.  Effects of sevoflurane and desflurane on otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Gurcan Gungor; Pervin Bozkurt-Sutas; Ozge Gedik; Ahmet Atas; Rovnat Babazade; Mehmet Yilmaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Impact of General Anesthesia on Safety and Outcomes in the Endovascular Arm of Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Trial.

Authors:  Alex Abou-Chebl; Sharon D Yeatts; Bernard Yan; Kevin Cockroft; Mayank Goyal; Tudor Jovin; Pooja Khatri; Phillip Meyers; Judith Spilker; Rebecca Sugg; Katja E Wartenberg; Tom Tomsick; Joe Broderick; Michael D Hill
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Desflurane. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and its efficacy in general anaesthesia.

Authors:  S S Patel; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Desflurane - revisited.

Authors:  Mukul Chandra Kapoor; Mahesh Vakamudi
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01

5.  The Sheep as a Comprehensive Animal Model to Investigate Interdependent Physiological Pressure Propagation and Multiparameter Influence on Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics.

Authors:  Nina Eva Trimmel; Anthony Podgoršak; Markus Florian Oertel; Simone Jucker; Margarete Arras; Marianne Schmid Daners; Miriam Weisskopf
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.