Literature DB >> 7998574

Detecting residual tumor after excisional biopsy of impalpable breast carcinoma: efficacy of comparing preoperative mammograms with radiographs of the biopsy specimen.

C H Lee1, D Carter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether a comparison of preoperative mammograms with radiographs of biopsy specimens is useful for determining the presence of residual breast tumor after an initial excision of impalpable breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiographs of tissue specimens obtained at the initial biopsy of 125 impalpable breast cancers were compared with the preoperative mammograms to determine if the lesion seen on the mammogram was completely excised. All tumors were impalpable, necessitating preoperative wire localization. The biopsies were usually excisional, and no special efforts were made to remove additional surrounding tissue. Specimen radiographs were rated as showing no residual tumor if the lesion appeared to be completely excised, showing residual tumor if the lesion did not appear to be completely removed, or indeterminate for residual tumor if adequacy of excision was uncertain. The presence or absence of tumor at the margins of the surgical specimen was determined by histologic examination. These results were correlated with the presence or absence of residual breast cancer at subsequent mastectomy (n = 71) or reexcision (n = 54).
RESULTS: The specimen radiograph showed complete excision of the mammographic lesion in 79 (63%) of the 125 cases. Tumor was found at mastectomy or reexcision in 35 of these cases, giving a false-negative rate for residual tumor of 44%. Incomplete excision was shown on 39 specimen radiographs. Eight of these 39 had no residual tumor, giving a false-positive rate of 21%. The sensitivity of the specimen radiograph for predicting the presence of residual tumor was 49%, specificity was 77%, and overall accuracy was 62%. The accuracy of pathologic examination of the margins of the biopsy specimen for predicting residual breast cancer was 58%. The specimen radiograph alone correctly identified 18 cases of residual tumor in which biopsy margins were indeterminate or negative for the presence of tumor.
CONCLUSION: The specimen radiograph is not reliable enough to be used alone for determining the presence or absence of residual breast cancer after the initial excision of impalpable breast cancer. However, it can be of value in predicting the presence of residual tumor in those cases in which results of pathologic examination of biopsy specimen margins are either indeterminate or negative for the presence of tumor but the specimen radiograph shows incomplete excision of the mammographic lesion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7998574     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.164.1.7998574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  5 in total

1.  Mammographically detected breast cancer. Benefits of stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy.

Authors:  J H Yim; P Barton; B Weber; D Radford; J Levy; B Monsees; F Flanagan; J A Norton; G M Doherty
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  High Residual Tumor Rate for Early Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy.

Authors:  Xiao-Fang He; Feng Ye; Jia-Huai Wen; Shuai-Jie Li; Xiao-Jia Huang; Xiang-Sheng Xiao; Xiao-Ming Xie
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 3.  Obtaining adequate surgical margins in breast-conserving therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: current modalities and future directions.

Authors:  Rick G Pleijhuis; Maurits Graafland; Jakob de Vries; Joost Bart; Johannes S de Jong; Gooitzen M van Dam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging system for intraoperative margin assessment for DCIS and invasive breast cancer using the ClearSight™ system in breast-conserving surgery-Results from a postmarketing study.

Authors:  Marc Thill; Iris Szwarcfiter; Katharina Kelling; Viviane van Haasteren; Eyal Kolka; Josefa Noelke; Zachi Peles; Moshe Papa; Sebastian Aulmann; Tanir Allweis
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.885

5.  Intraoperative ultrasound reduces the need for re-excision in breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Hasan Karanlik; Ilker Ozgur; Dilek Sahin; Merdan Fayda; Semen Onder; Ekrem Yavuz
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.754

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.