Literature DB >> 7998375

A comparison of methods used to calculate ultrasonic myocardial backscatter in the time domain.

C M Moran1, G R Sutherland, T Anderson, R A Riemersma, W N McDicken.   

Abstract

The cyclic variation of ultrasonic integrated backscatter from the left ventricular posterior wall and interventricular septum of the heart is now well documented in the literature, with minimal values occurring at end-systole and maximal at end-diastole. However, little work has been performed to date to determine whether cyclic cardiac variation of other, more easily derived, backscatter parameters exists. In this study, 20 baseline, epicardial, long-axis cardiac-cycle sequences were obtained from eight open-chest pigs, yielding a total of 285 ultrasonic frames of RF data, which were analysed off-line on a Sun workstation. In addition, the video data from these studies was digitised and collected from each scan. Five backscatter parameters, calculated in the time-domain, including (1) the average integrated backscatter; (2) the average of the backscatter power from the log-compressed data; (3) the square of the average of the uncompressed radio frequency (RF) amplitude; (4) the square of the average of the RF amplitude from the log-compressed data; and (5) the square of the average grey-scale video data, were analysed and their variation throughout the cardiac cycle correlated against that obtained from integrated backscatter measurements. The backscatter values obtained were referenced to a gel calibration phantom widely used for 2-D calibration studies. Significant (p < 0.001), good correlation existed between the four backscatter parameters derived from the RF data. Reduced correlation was obtained between the video backscatter parameter and those derived from the RF data. Maximum cyclic variation between systole and diastole was measured from the integrated backscatter parameter and minimum from the three log-compressed data sets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7998375     DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(94)90090-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  2 in total

1.  A Preliminary Study on Exploring a potential Ultrasound Method for Predicting Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Qiuqing Zheng; Chunyi Lin; Dong Xu; Huicheng Zhao; Mei Song; Di Ou; Le Shi
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

2.  Echocardiographic integrated backscatter for detecting progression and regression of aortic valve calcifications in rats.

Authors:  Bram Roosens; Gezim Bala; Kris Gillis; Isabel Remory; Steven Droogmans; Joan Somja; Eléonore Delvenne; Joeri De Nayer; Johan Schiettecatte; Philippe Delvenne; Patrizio Lancellotti; Guy Van Camp; Bernard Cosyns
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.062

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.