Literature DB >> 7997550

Effects of a program to train radiologic technologists to identify abnormalities on mammograms.

L W Bassett1, A J Hollatz-Brown, R Bastani, J G Pearce, K Hirji, L Chen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess whether radiologic technologists could be successfully trained to identify abnormalities on mammograms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight radiologic technologists from two different institutions took a pretest, underwent an 8-hour training course followed by a period of preceptorship, and then took a posttest. Seven radiologists also took the pretest and posttest, which consisted of evaluating 1,238 two-view screening examinations, including 318 biopsy-proved cancers.
RESULTS: Overall, technologists at institution 1 had lower sensitivity (78%) at the pretest, which improved at the posttest (90%). Technologists at institution 2 had lower specificity at the pretest (44%), which improved on the posttest (64%). Hypothetical pairing of radiologists and technologists with use of posttest results revealed an increase in sensitivity (median increase, 12% at institution 1 and 19% at institution 2).
CONCLUSION: Formalized training successfully modified the technologists' skills. Radiologic technologists could be used to increase the number of breast cancers detected at screening mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7997550     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.194.1.7997550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  4 in total

1.  The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Thad Benefield; Mary W Marsh; Bruce F Schroeder; Danielle D Durham; Bonnie C Yankaskas; J Michael Bowling
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Radiographers supporting radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography: a viable strategy to meet the shortage in the number of radiologists.

Authors:  Gabriela Torres-Mejía; Robert A Smith; María de la Luz Carranza-Flores; Andy Bogart; Louis Martínez-Matsushita; Diana L Miglioretti; Karla Kerlikowske; Carolina Ortega-Olvera; Ernesto Montemayor-Varela; Angélica Angeles-Llerenas; Sergio Bautista-Arredondo; Gilberto Sánchez-González; Olga G Martínez-Montañez; Santos R Uscanga-Sánchez; Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Mauricio Hernández-Ávila
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Evaluating radiographers' diagnostic accuracy in screen-reading mammograms: what constitutes a quality study?

Authors:  Josephine C Debono; Ann E Poulos
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-08-14

4.  Evaluation of radiographers' mammography screen-reading accuracy in Australia.

Authors:  Josephine C Debono; Ann E Poulos; Nehmat Houssami; Robin M Turner; John Boyages
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-08-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.