Literature DB >> 7996811

Demographic and geographic variability of kidney stones in the United States.

J M Soucie1, M J Thun, R J Coates, W McClellan, H Austin.   

Abstract

To characterize demographic and regional variation in kidney stone prevalence in the U.S. we studied two nationwide cross-sectional surveys that included data on self-reported, physician-diagnosed kidney stones, supplementing published data on hospitalizations for stones. The larger study, Cancer Prevention Study II (CPS II), included 1,185,124 men and women, age > or = 30, recruited nationally in 1982, and provides state-specific prevalence estimates. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II) was a national probability sample of 25,286 U.S. adults interviewed between 1976 and 1980. Kidney stone prevalence increased with age until age 70, then declined and was higher in men than women and in whites than blacks. Prevalence among Hispanic and Asian men was intermediate between that of whites and blacks. There was a strong, statistically significant regional variability in stone prevalence among U.S. whites. The age-adjusted prevalence increased from north to south, and from west to east. The contrast in state-specific prevalence was greatest between men in North Carolina (prevalence = 14.9; 95% confidence interval = 14.2 to 15.7) and North Dakota (5.6; 4.7 to 6.4), and between women in South Carolina (6.4; 5.8 to 6.9) and South Dakota (2.4; 1.9 to 2.9). The marked variations in kidney stone prevalence by age, gender, race, and geographic location may provide clues to their etiology and prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7996811     DOI: 10.1038/ki.1994.347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  73 in total

1.  Shock wave lithotripsy is not predictive of hypertension among community stone formers at long-term followup.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Andrew D Rule; Xujian Li; Eric J Bergstralh; Matthew T Gettman; John C Lieske
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Urolithiasis in a rural Wisconsin population from 1992 to 2008: narrowing of the male-to-female ratio.

Authors:  Kristina L Penniston; Ian D McLaren; Robert T Greenlee; Stephen Y Nakada
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  The epithelial calcium channels TRPV5 and TRPV6: regulation and implications for disease.

Authors:  Monique van Abel; Joost G J Hoenderop; René J M Bindels
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Urolithiasis, idiopathic hypercalciuria and insularity.

Authors:  Víctor García Nieto; Félix Claverie-Martin
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 5.  Epidemiology of stone disease.

Authors:  Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  An Increase Incidence in Uric Acid Nephrolithiasis: Changing Patterns.

Authors:  Asha Kumari; Sumit Dokwal; Pawan Mittal; Rajender Kumar; Richa Goel; Piyush Bansal; Himanshu Devender Kumar; Jaikrit Bhutani
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-07-01

7.  Incidence of kidney stone disease in Icelandic children and adolescents from 1985 to 2013: results of a nationwide study.

Authors:  Vidar O Edvardsson; Solborg E Ingvarsdottir; Runolfur Palsson; Olafur S Indridason
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 8.  Ureteroscopy and stones: Current status and future expectations.

Authors:  Anna E Wright; Nicholas J Rukin; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2014-11-06

9.  Phenotypic and functional analysis of human SLC26A6 variants in patients with familial hyperoxaluria and calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Carla G Monico; Adam Weinstein; Zhirong Jiang; Audrey L Rohlinger; Andrea G Cogal; Beth B Bjornson; Julie B Olson; Eric J Bergstralh; Dawn S Milliner; Peter S Aronson
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 10.  The exposome for kidney stones.

Authors:  David S Goldfarb
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.