Literature DB >> 7996543

Synthesis and molecular modeling of 1-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolines and related 5,6,8,9-tetrahydro-13bH-dibenzo[a,h]quinolizines as D1 dopamine antagonists.

D L Minor1, S D Wyrick, P S Charifson, V J Watts, D E Nichols, R B Mailman.   

Abstract

New 1-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolines and related 5,6,8,9-tetrahydro- 13bH-dibenzo[a,h]-quinolizines were prepared as ring-contracted analogs of the prototypical 1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydrobenzazepines (e.g., SCH23390) as a continuation of our studies to characterize the antagonist binding pharmacophore of the D1 dopamine receptor. Receptor affinity was assessed by competition for [3H]SCH23390 binding sites in rat striatal membranes. The 6-bromo-1-phenyltetrahydroisoquinoline analog 2 of SCH23390 1 had D1 binding affinity similar to that for the previously reported 6-chloro analog 6, whereas the 6,7-dihydroxy analog 5 had significantly lower D1 affinity. Conversely, neither 6-monohydroxy- (3) nor 7-monohydroxy-1-phenyltetrahydroisoquinolines (4) had significant affinity for the D1 receptor. These results demonstrate that 6-halo and 7-hydroxy substituents influence D1 binding affinity of the 1-phenyltetrahydroisoquinolines in a fashion similar to their effects on 1-phenyltetrahydrobenzazepines. The conformationally constrained 3-chloro-2-hydroxytetrahydrodibenzoquinolizine 9 had much lower affinity relative to the corresponding, and more flexible, 6-chloro-7-hydroxy-1-phenyltetrahydroisoquinoline 6. Similarly, 2,3-dihydroxytetrahydrodibenzoquinolizine 10 had much lower D1 affinity compared to dihydrexidine 14, a structurally similar hexahydrobenzo[a]phenanthridine that is a high-affinity full D1 agonist. Together, these data not only confirm the effects of the halo and hydroxy substitutents on the parent nucleus but demonstrate the pharmacophoric importance of both the nitrogen position and the orientation of the accessory phenyl ring in modulating D1 receptor affinity and function. Molecular modeling studies and conformational analyses were conducted using the data from these new analogs in combination with the data from compounds previously synthesized. The resulting geometries were used to refine a working model of the D1 antagonist pharmacophore using conventional quantitative structure-activity relationships and three-dimensional QSAR (CoMFA).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7996543     DOI: 10.1021/jm00051a008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  5 in total

1.  A novel automated lazy learning QSAR (ALL-QSAR) approach: method development, applications, and virtual screening of chemical databases using validated ALL-QSAR models.

Authors:  Shuxing Zhang; Alexander Golbraikh; Scott Oloff; Harold Kohn; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  MHTP, a synthetic tetratetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloid, attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury via p38MAPK/p65NF-κB signaling pathway-TLR4 dependent.

Authors:  Bianka Márcia do Nascimento Xavier; Larissa Adilis Maria Paiva Ferreira; Laércia Karla Diega Paiva Ferreira; Francisco Allysson Assis Ferreira Gadelha; Talissa Mozzini Monteiro; Luiz André de Araújo Silva; Luís Cesar Rodrigues; Marcia Regina Piuvezam
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.575

3.  De-novo design, synthesis and evaluation of novel 6,7-dimethoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline derivatives as HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Authors:  Subhash Chander; Penta Ashok; Anupam Singh; Sankaranarayanan Murugesan
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.215

4.  Synthesis, DNA binding and antitumor evaluation of styelsamine and cystodytin analogues.

Authors:  Hugo K H Fong; Brent R Copp
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.118

5.  Biosynthesis of plant tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloids through an imine reductase route.

Authors:  Lu Yang; Jinmei Zhu; Chenghai Sun; Zixin Deng; Xudong Qu
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 9.825

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.