Literature DB >> 7996231

Assessment of the nutritional adequacy of pet foods through the life cycle.

J G Morris1, Q R Rogers.   

Abstract

Despite the lack of precise information on the requirements for many of the nutrients essential for cats and dogs and the paucity of information on the availability of nutrients in foods, many commercial diets support excellent growth, reproduction, and maintenance. However, these diets use empirical information that cannot be readily applied to the formulation of new diets. Progress in companion animal nutrition requires more precise information on requirements for various life stages (especially reproduction and maintenance), along with values for the bioavailability of nutrients in dietary ingredients. There is virtually no information on the bioavailability of nutrients for companion animals in many of the common dietary ingredients used in pet foods. These ingredients are generally byproducts of the meat, poultry and fishing industries, with the potential for wide variation in nutrient composition. Claims of nutritional adequacy of pet foods based on the current Association of American Feed Control Official (AAFCO) nutrient allowances ("profiles") do not give assurances of nutritional adequacy and will not until ingredients are analyzed and bioavailability values are incorporated. The AAFCO feeding test provides a superior method for assessing nutritional adequacy to the profile, although the current protocol has procedural and interpretative limitations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7996231     DOI: 10.1093/jn/124.suppl_12.2520S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  7 in total

Review 1.  Nutrition and health of dogs and cats: evolution of petfood.

Authors:  V Bontempo
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Dietary phenylalanine requirements are similar in small, medium, and large breed adult dogs using the direct amino acid oxidation technique.

Authors:  Wilfredo D Mansilla; Alicia Gorman; Lisa Fortener; Anna K Shoveller
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The Hard Choice about Dry Pet Food: Comparison of Protein and Lipid Nutritional Qualities and Digestibility of Three Different Chicken-Based Formulations.

Authors:  Nicolò Montegiove; Eleonora Calzoni; Alessio Cesaretti; Roberto Maria Pellegrino; Carla Emiliani; Alessia Pellegrino; Leonardo Leonardi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.231

4.  Dietary factors associated with faecal consistency and other indicators of gastrointestinal health in the captive cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus).

Authors:  Katherine M Whitehouse-Tedd; Sandra L Lefebvre; Geert P J Janssens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Vegan versus meat-based dog food: Guardian-reported indicators of health.

Authors:  Andrew Knight; Eason Huang; Nicholas Rai; Hazel Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Vegetarian versus Meat-Based Diets for Companion Animals.

Authors:  Andrew Knight; Madelaine Leitsberger
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Lysine requirements in small, medium, and large breed adult dogs using the indicator amino acid oxidation technique.

Authors:  Katja A K Sutherland; Wilfredo D Mansilla; Lisa Fortener; Anna K Shoveller
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.