Literature DB >> 7995767

Role of postoperative radiation therapy after stabilization of fractures caused by metastatic disease.

P W Townsend1, S R Smalley, S C Cozad, H G Rosenthal, R E Hassanein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although orthopedic stabilization is frequently performed for pathological fractures caused by metastatic disease, no data is available to support the value of postoperative radiation therapy (S+RT) in this setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed 64 orthopedic stabilization procedures in 60 consecutive patients with metastatic disease to previously unirradiated weight-bearing bones with pathological or impending pathological fracture (femur 91%). Thirty-five sites that received adjuvant S+RT were compared to 29 sites that were treated with surgery alone (SA). Many potential prognostic variables were evaluated. Endpoints were: functional status (FS) of the extremity (1 = normal pain free use; 2 = normal use with pain, 3 = significantly limited use; 4 = nonfunctional extremity), subsequent orthopedic procedures to the same site, and survival following surgery.
RESULTS: At the univariate level, S+RT (p = 0.02) and prefracture FS (p = 0.04) were the only significant predictors of patients achieving an FS of 1 or 2 after surgery. On multivariate analysis, only postoperative RT was significantly (p = 0.02) associated with attaining FS of 1 or 2 after surgery. The predicted probability of achieving FS 1 or 2 at any time was 53% for S+RT vs. 11.5% or SA (multiple logistic regression, p < 0.01). Evaluation of FS following surgery revealed that S+RT group had significantly better function in the 1-3, 3-6, and 6-12 month postoperative periods (chi-square, p < 0.04 for each time period). Second orthopedic procedures to the same site were more common in the SA group than the S+RT group (log rank, p = 0.03). Actuarial median survival of S group was 3.3 months compared with 12.4 months for the S+RT group (log rank, p = 0.02), confirming the beneficial association with survival shown by the multivariate Cox regression analysis (p = 0.025).
CONCLUSION: Although this retrospective study is subject to possible biases, several analyses adjusting for numerous prognostic factors uniformly indicate S+RT is the most important factor in patients achieving and maintaining normal functional status (+/- pain). Further, the S+RT group was associated with fewer orthopedic procedures as well as an improved overall survival. The improved survival may be due to (a) more favorable patients being referred for RT (possible section bias), or (b) improved functional status in the S+RT group. This study quantitatively supports the benefit of postoperative RT in this setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7995767     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)E0310-G

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  17 in total

1.  The Carbofix™ "Piccolo Proximal femur nail": A new perspective for treating proximal femur lesion. A technique report.

Authors:  Carmine Zoccali; Antonella Soriani; Barbara Rossi; Nicola Salducca; Roberto Biagini
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-07-06

Review 2.  [Metastatic disease in long bones : Review of surgical treatment options].

Authors:  Franz Liska; Philipp Schmitz; Norbert Harrasser; Peter Prodinger; Hans Rechl; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures.

Authors:  Matthew Steensma; Patrick J Boland; Carol D Morris; Edward Athanasian; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Skeletal Related Events are Rare After Radiation Treatment for Metastatic Disease of the Femur.

Authors:  Zachary Mayo; Bryan G Allen; Qiang An; Benjamin J Miller
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2021

5.  A long femoral stem is not always required in hip arthroplasty for patients with proximal femur metastases.

Authors:  Zhiqing Xing; Bryan S Moon; Robert L Satcher; Patrick P Lin; Valerae O Lewis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Assessment of the risk factors for impending fractures following radiotherapy for long bone metastases using CT scan-based virtual simulation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Zuzana Tatar; Martin Soubrier; Anne Françoise Dillies; Pierre Verrelle; Stéphane Boisgard; Michel Lapeyre
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 7.  International patterns of practice in radiotherapy for bone metastases: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Rachel McDonald; Edward Chow; Henry Lam; Leigha Rowbottom; Hany Soliman
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 4.072

8.  Radiotherapy, Bisphosphonates and Surgical Stabilization of Complete or Impending Pathologic Fractures in Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease.

Authors:  Michal J Wolanczyk; Khashayar Fakhrian; Irenäus A Adamietz
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  The role of postoperative radiation and coordination of care in patients with metastatic bone disease of the appendicular skeleton.

Authors:  Andrew R Summers; Travis Philipp; Jacob D Mikula; Kenneth R Gundle
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2018-02-16

10.  A definition of "uncomplicated bone metastases" based on previous bone metastases radiation trials comparing single-fraction and multi-fraction radiation therapy.

Authors:  Paul M Cheon; Erin Wong; Nemica Thavarajah; Kristopher Dennis; Stephen Lutz; Liang Zeng; Edward Chow
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.072

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.