Literature DB >> 7993170

Reliability of measuring isometric and isokinetic peak torque, rate of torque development, integrated electromyography, and tibial nerve conduction velocity.

G G Sleivert1, H A Wenger.   

Abstract

To determine the reliability of measures used in neuromuscular diagnosis and rehabilitation, 23 adults underwent identical testing on two occasions. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) showed the reliability of peak torque measurement to depend both on the movement tested and velocity of contraction (leg extension ICC = 0.64-0.94, plantar flexion ICC = 0.55-0.76, leg press ICC = 0.72-0.91). Peak rate of torque development (RTD) and the percentage of peak torque at peak RTD were not reliable for any movement (ICC = 0.02-0.28). Mean RTD between 30% and 60% of peak torque was unreliable for leg press (ICC = 0.46), yet fairly reliable for both knee extension (ICC = 0.61) and plantar flexion (ICC = 0.63). Mean integrated electromyography (IEMG) showed fair to good reliability for isometric and 1.05 rad.s-1 leg press (ICC = 0.66, 0.90, respectively), and plantar flexion and leg extension (ICC = 0.75-0.89). Tibial nerve conduction velocity was highly reliable (ICC = 0.89). A range of reliabilities can be expected when measuring these variables, and must be considered when interpreting neuromuscular data.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7993170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  19 in total

1.  Muscle strength testing: evaluation of tests of explosive force production.

Authors:  Dragan M Mirkov; Aleksandar Nedeljkovic; Sladjan Milanovic; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Movement performance and body size: the relationship for different groups of tests.

Authors:  Goran Markovic; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  The use of isometric tests of muscular function in athletic assessment.

Authors:  G J Wilson; A J Murphy
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Muscle architecture and EMG activity changes during isotonic and isokinetic eccentric exercises.

Authors:  Gaël Guilhem; Christophe Cornu; Arnaud Guével
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Enhanced precision of ankle torque measure with an open-unit dynamometer mounted with a 3D force-torque sensor.

Authors:  A Toumi; S Leteneur; C Gillet; J-F Debril; N Decoufour; F Barbier; J M Jakobi; Emilie Simoneau-Buessinger
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Adaptations to Endurance and Strength Training.

Authors:  David C Hughes; Stian Ellefsen; Keith Baar
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 6.915

7.  The Relationship of Knee-Extensor Strength and Rate of Torque Development to Sit-to-Stand Performance in Older Adults.

Authors:  Katie Crockett; Kimberly Ardell; Marlyn Hermanson; Andrea Penner; Joel Lanovaz; Jonathan Farthing; Cathy Arnold
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

8.  Selective muscle contraction during plantarflexion is incompatible with maximal voluntary torque assessment.

Authors:  Nicolas A Turpin; Antony Costes; David Villeger; Bruno Watier
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Quantifying thigh muscle co-activation during isometric knee extension contractions: within- and between-session reliability.

Authors:  Dimitrios Katsavelis; A Joseph Threlkeld
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.368

10.  Muscle contractility dysfunction precedes loss of motor unit connectivity in SOD1(G93A) mice.

Authors:  Christopher G Wier; Alexander E Crum; Anthony B Reynolds; Chitra C Iyer; Deepti Chugh; Marilly S Palettas; Patrick L Heilman; David M Kline; W David Arnold; Stephen J Kolb
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.