Literature DB >> 7991514

The imprecision in rates of Down syndrome by 1-year maternal age intervals: a critical analysis of rates used in biochemical screening.

C A Hecht1, E B Hook.   

Abstract

Current algorithms to determine eligibility for prenatal cytogenetic diagnostic services depend critically on the accuracy and precision of the underlying rates of cytogenetic abnormality used in the calculations. We examine the maternal age-specific rates of Down syndrome livebirths in eight studies of European-origin populations, pooled rates from which are widely used for baseline calculations in biochemical screening. These studies vary significantly in such factors as methods of ascertainment of cases, likelihood of complete ascertainment, and methods of correction, if any, for underascertainment. Restriction of analysis to those two studies among the eight whose methods suggest the greatest likelihood of complete ascertainment for Down syndrome generates rates significantly higher than those in widespread use. Confidence intervals about previously reported and currently derived rates indicate that even with large-scale data, there is considerable residual uncertainty in derived rates.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7991514     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1970140814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  6 in total

1.  Screening for Down's syndrome: effects, safety, and cost effectiveness of first and second trimester strategies.

Authors:  R E Gilbert; C Augood; R Gupta; A E Ades; S Logan; M Sculpher; J H van Der Meulen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-25

2.  International variation in reported livebirth prevalence rates of Down syndrome, adjusted for maternal age.

Authors:  A D Carothers; C A Hecht; E B Hook
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Maternal age specific risk rate estimates for Down syndrome among live births in whites and other races from Ohio and metropolitan Atlanta, 1970-1989.

Authors:  C A Huether; J Ivanovich; B S Goodwin; E L Krivchenia; V S Hertzberg; L D Edmonds; D S May; J H Priest
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  The natural history of Down syndrome conceptuses diagnosed prenatally that are not electively terminated.

Authors:  E B Hook; D E Mutton; R Ide; E Alberman; M Bobrow
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Primary prevention of Down's syndrome.

Authors:  Howard S Cuckle
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Estimation of single-year-of-age counts of live births, fetal losses, abortions, and pregnant women for counties of Texas.

Authors:  Bismark Singh; Lauren Ancel Meyers
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-05-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.