Literature DB >> 7991356

Stereoscopic perception with brief exposures.

W R Uttal1, N S Davis, C Welke.   

Abstract

In this report we describe the results of an experiment in which we demonstrated that a powerful and compelling stereoscopic experience is elicited with very brief (< 1 msec) stimulus durations. The observers were highly successful in recognizing briefly flashed, stereoscopic, random-dot surfaces in the absence of monocular contours. The results are shown to be closely related to the range of depths for any stimulus form; however, the recognition thresholds were nonmonotonic as a function of disparity. Previous investigators have disagreed about the existence of a temporal threshold for stereopsis. We believe that prior findings suggesting that stereopsis cannot occur at short exposure durations are probably due to inadequate control of fixation disparity. Therefore, there is poor dichoptic image registration when a stereoscopic stimulus is presented. The present results also raise difficulties for any theory of stereopsis that requires eye movements.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7991356     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  15 in total

1.  Parameters of tachistoscopic stereopis.

Authors:  W R Uttal; J Fitzgerald; T E Eskin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  BINOCULAR DEPTH PERCEPTION WITHOUT FAMILIARITY CUES.

Authors:  B JULESZ
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-07-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The reconstruction of static visual forms from sparse dotted samples.

Authors:  W R Uttal; N S Davis; C Welke; R Kakarala
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-03

4.  Improvement in stereoanomaly with practice.

Authors:  J M Foley; W Richards
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1974-12

5.  Stereopsis and stereoblindness.

Authors:  W Richards
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Anomalous stereoscopic depth perception.

Authors:  W Richards
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1971-03

7.  On the confounding effects of phosphor persistence in oscilloscopic displays.

Authors:  R Groner; M T Groner; P Müller; W F Bischof; V Di Lollo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Binocular retinal image motion during active head rotation.

Authors:  R M Steinman; H Collewijn
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Stimulus uncertainty does not impair stereopsis.

Authors:  J D Staller; J S Lappin; R Fox
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-04

10.  Anomalies of disparity detection in the human visual system.

Authors:  R Jones
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  3 in total

1.  Angular declination and the dynamic perception of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; John W Philbeck; Philip W Wirtz; David Chichka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Optimal Stereoacuity Reveals More Than Critical Time in Patients With Intermittent Exotropia.

Authors:  Haoran Wu; Xiaoning Li; Yao Tang; Qinglin Xu; Xuhong Zhang; Lu Zhou; Weizhong Lan; Bin Zhang; Zhikuan Yang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Temporal dynamics of mirror-symmetry perception.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sharman; Sebastian Gregersen; Elena Gheorghiu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.