Literature DB >> 7988598

Determination of left ventricular volume by two-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

M C Herregods1, G De Paep, B Bijnens, J G Bogaert, F E Rademakers, H T Bosmans, E P Bellon, G J Marchal, A L Baert, F Van de Werf.   

Abstract

Left ventricular volume was determined in 12 healthy volunteers using a newly developed two-dimensional echocardiographic delineation method. The results were compared with those of magnetic resonance imaging, which served as the method of reference. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume was 123 +/- 12 ml, echocardiographically defined, and 121 +/- 12 ml calculated with magnetic resonance imaging. End-systolic volume was 41 +/- 7 ml on echocardiography and 37 +/- 6 ml on magnetic resonance imaging. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 67 +/- 4%, echocardiographically defined, and 70 +/- 5%, calculated with magnetic resonance imaging. There was no statistical difference for any of the measured parameters. Interstudy and inter-observer variability was minimal. In conclusion, in healthy volunteers left ventricular volume was accurately defined, using this newly developed two-dimensional echocardiographic delineation method. During endocardial delineation a dynamic display is continuously available on a second window, allowing precise visual edge-detection. Moreover, corrections can be made easily and quickly. These two advantages enhance the accuracy of the method, even in cases of poor echogenicity.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7988598     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  5 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J Crnac; M C Schmidt; P Theissen; U Sechtem
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Measurement of left ventricular volume after anterior myocardial infarction: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, and radionuclide ventriculography.

Authors:  K H Darasz; S R Underwood; J Bayliss; S M Forbat; J Keegan; P A Poole-Wilson; G C Sutton; D Pennell
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Interventional magnetic resonance imaging for guiding gene and cell transfer in the heart.

Authors:  I M Barbash; J Leor; M S Feinberg; A Tessone; S Aboulafia-Etzion; A Orenstein; J Ruiz-Cabello; J S Cohen; Y Mardor
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Left ventricular remodeling with preserved function after coronary microembolization: the effect of methylprednisolone.

Authors:  Jianying Ma; Juying Qian; Shufu Chang; Zhangwei Chen; Hang Jin; Mengsu Zeng; Yunzeng Zou; Junbo Ge
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.175

5.  Variability in Ejection Fraction Measured By Echocardiography, Gated Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography, and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

Authors:  Patricia A Pellikka; Lilin She; Thomas A Holly; Grace Lin; Padmini Varadarajan; Ramdas G Pai; Robert O Bonow; Gerald M Pohost; Julio A Panza; Daniel S Berman; David L Prior; Federico M Asch; Salvador Borges-Neto; Paul Grayburn; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Karol Miszalski-Jamka; Patrice Desvigne-Nickens; Kerry L Lee; Eric J Velazquez; Jae K Oh
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-08-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.