Literature DB >> 7988103

Assessment of liver metabolic function. Clinical implications.

J Brockmöller1, I Roots.   

Abstract

Inter- and intraindividual variability in pharmacokinetics of most drugs is largely determined by variable liver function as described by parameters of hepatic blood flow and metabolic capacity. These parameters may be altered as a result of disease affecting the liver, genetic differences in metabolising enzymes, and various types of drug interactions, including enzyme induction, enzyme inhibition or down-regulation. With the now known large number of drug metabolising enzymes, their differential substrate specificity, and their differential induction or inhibition, each test substance of liver function should be used as a probe for its specific metabolising enzyme. Thus, the concept of model test-substances providing general information about liver function has severe limitations. To test the metabolic activity of several enzymes, either several test substances may be given (cocktail approach) or several metabolites of a single test substance may be analysed (metabolic fingerprint approach). The enzyme-specific analysis of liver function results in a preference for analysis of the metabolites rather than analysis of the clearance of the parent test substance. There are specific methods to quantify the activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes such as CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19MEPH, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, and CYP3A, and phase II enzymes, such as glutathione S-transferases, glucuronyl-transferases or N-acetyltransferases, in vivo. Interactions based on competitive or noncompetitive inhibition should be analysed specifically for the cytochrome P450 enzyme involved. At least 5 different types of cytochrome P450 enzyme induction may result in major variability of hepatic function; this may be quantified by biochemical parameters, clearance methods, or highly enzyme-specific methods such as Western blot analysis or molecular biological techniques such as mRNA quantification in blood and tissues. Therapeutic drug monitoring is already implicitly used for quantification of the enzyme activities relevant for a specific drug. Selective impairment of hepatic enzymes due to gene mutations may have an effect on the pharmacokinetics of certain drugs similar to that caused by cirrhosis. Assessment of this heritable source of variability in liver function is possible by in vivo or ex vivo enzymological methods. For genetically polymorphic enzymes and carrier proteins involved in drug disposition, molecular genetic methods using a patient's blood sample may be used for classification of the individual into: (i) the impaired or poor metaboliser (homozygous deficient); (ii) the extensive (homozygous active) metaboliser group; and (iii) the moderately extensive metaboliser (heterozygous) group. For hepatic blood flow determinations, galactose or sorbitol given at relatively low doses may be much better indicators than the indocyanine green.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7988103     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199427030-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  318 in total

1.  The antipyrine test in clinical pharmacology: conceptions and misconceptions.

Authors:  E S Vesell
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Studies on the disposition of antipyrine, aminopyrine, and phenacetin using plasma, saliva, and urine.

Authors:  E S Vesell; G T Passananti; P A Glenwright; B H Dvorchik
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Genotyping of poor metabolisers of debrisoquine by allele-specific PCR amplification.

Authors:  M Heim; U A Meyer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-09-01       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Oxidation of midazolam and triazolam by human liver cytochrome P450IIIA4.

Authors:  T Kronbach; D Mathys; M Umeno; F J Gonzalez; U A Meyer
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 5.  Nutrition and chemical biotransformations in man.

Authors:  A H Conney; E J Pantuck; R Kuntzman; A Kappas; K E Anderson; A P Alvares
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Variability of indocyanine green pharmacokinetics in healthy adults.

Authors:  L A Bauer; J R Horn; K E Opheim
Journal:  Clin Pharm       Date:  1989-01

7.  Differential effects of enzyme induction on antipyrine metabolite formation.

Authors:  M Danhof; R M Verbeek; C J van Boxtel; J K Boeijinga; D D Breimer
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Paracetamol as a test drug to determine glucuronide formation in man. Effects of inducers and of smoking.

Authors:  K W Bock; J Wiltfang; R Blume; D Ullrich; J Bircher
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Identification of the rabbit and human cytochromes P-450IIIA as the major enzymes involved in the N-demethylation of diltiazem.

Authors:  L Pichard; G Gillet; I Fabre; I Dalet-Beluche; C Bonfils; J P Thenot; P Maurel
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.922

10.  Heterogeneity of CYP3A isoforms metabolizing erythromycin and cortisol.

Authors:  C M Hunt; P B Watkins; P Saenger; G M Stave; N Barlascini; C O Watlington; J T Wright; P S Guzelian
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 6.875

View more
  26 in total

1.  Liver function evaluation in dogs by the galactose load test.

Authors:  D Bernardini; H Poser; A Giuliani; G Tacchio; F Franceschi
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Cytochrome P450 2D6 variants in a Caucasian population: allele frequencies and phenotypic consequences.

Authors:  C Sachse; J Brockmöller; S Bauer; I Roots
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Heat exposure and drugs. A review of the effects of hyperthermia on pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  J Vanakoski; T Seppälä
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Different alterations of cytochrome P450 3A4 isoform and its gene expression in livers of patients with chronic liver diseases.

Authors:  Li-Qun Yang; Shen-Jing Li; Yun-Fei Cao; Xiao-Bo Man; Wei-Feng Yu; Hong-Yang Wang; Meng-Chao Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Effect of hepatic insufficiency on pharmacokinetics and drug dosing.

Authors:  R K Verbeeck; Y Horsmans
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1998-10

6.  Physiologically based modelling of inhibition of metabolism and assessment of the relative potency of drug and metabolite: dextromethorphan vs. dextrorphan using quinidine inhibition.

Authors:  A A Moghadamnia; A Rostami-Hodjegan; R Abdul-Manap; C E Wright; A H Morice; G T Tucker
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Influence of diet and nutritional status on drug metabolism.

Authors:  I Walter-Sack; U Klotz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and interactions of acid pump inhibitors. Focus on omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole.

Authors:  T Andersson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetics and dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic dysfunction.

Authors:  Roger K Verbeeck
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 10.  Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in patients with liver disease. An update.

Authors:  D J Morgan; A J McLean
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.