Literature DB >> 7985658

Heterogeneity of melanoma risk in families of melanoma patients.

J F Aitken1, D L Duffy, A Green, P Youl, R MacLennan, N G Martin.   

Abstract

While it is recognized that relatives of melanoma patients are at increased risk for this disease, the source and extent of variation in melanoma risk between families of melanoma cases is unknown. Heterogeneity of familial melanoma risk was assessed among the families (comprising 7,666 first-degree relatives) of 1,149 cutaneous melanoma cases diagnosed in Queensland, Australia, between 1982 and 1987. The measure of familial melanoma risk was based on the number of cases of melanoma in the family in excess of those predicted from the age-, sex-, and birth cohort-specific cumulative incidences of melanoma among all relatives in the sample. Probands over-reported melanoma occurrence among their relatives, with a false positive reporting rate of 44.5% (216 false reports out of 485). Only medically verified cases among relatives were included in the analysis. There was statistically significant heterogeneity in family risk, with 53 (4.7%) of the total 1,116 unrelated families containing significantly more melanoma cases than expected considering the size of the family, and the age, sex, and birth cohort distributions of family members. In univariate analyses, members of the high-risk families were significantly more likely to have poor ability to tan, a propensity to sunburn, fair skin color, red hair, and many melanocytic nevi. When all variables were included simultaneously in a multiple logistic regression model, only the associations with tanning ability, skin color, and number of nevi remained significant. There were no significant differences overall between high-risk and other families in the sites and ages at diagnosis of melanoma, although melanomas on variably sun-exposed sites (trunk and legs) were diagnosed earlier in the high-risk families, independent of the stage at diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7985658     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  8 in total

1.  Melanocortin-1 receptor polymorphisms and risk of melanoma: is the association explained solely by pigmentation phenotype?

Authors:  J S Palmer; D L Duffy; N F Box; J F Aitken; L E O'Gorman; A C Green; N K Hayward; N G Martin; R A Sturm
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  IRF4 variants have age-specific effects on nevus count and predispose to melanoma.

Authors:  David L Duffy; Mark M Iles; Dan Glass; Gu Zhu; Jennifer H Barrett; Veronica Höiom; Zhen Z Zhao; Richard A Sturm; Nicole Soranzo; Chris Hammond; Marina Kvaskoff; David C Whiteman; Massimo Mangino; Johan Hansson; Julia A Newton-Bishop; Veronique Bataille; Nicholas K Hayward; Nicholas G Martin; D Timothy Bishop; Timothy D Spector; Grant W Montgomery
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Nevi, family history, and fair skin increase the risk of second primary melanoma.

Authors:  Victor Siskind; Maria Celia B Hughes; Jane M Palmer; Judith M Symmons; Joanne F Aitken; Nicholas G Martin; Nicholas K Hayward; David C Whiteman
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 8.551

4.  Skin cancer screening behaviours among individuals with a strong family history of malignant melanoma.

Authors:  N A Kasparian; J K McLoone; B Meiser; P N Butow; J M Simpson; G J Mann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  A population-based study of Australian twins with melanoma suggests a strong genetic contribution to liability.

Authors:  Sri N Shekar; David L Duffy; Philippa Youl; Amanda J Baxter; Marina Kvaskoff; David C Whiteman; Adèle C Green; Maria C Hughes; Nicholas K Hayward; Marylon Coates; Nicholas G Martin
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 6.  Estimating the referral rate for cancer genetic assessment from a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  C Featherstone; A Colley; K Tucker; J Kirk; M B Barton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Multiplex melanoma families are enriched for polygenic risk.

Authors:  Matthew H Law; Lauren G Aoude; David L Duffy; Georgina V Long; Peter A Johansson; Antonia L Pritchard; Kiarash Khosrotehrani; Graham J Mann; Grant W Montgomery; Mark M Iles; Anne E Cust; Jane M Palmer; Kerwin F Shannon; Andrew J Spillane; Jonathan R Stretch; John F Thompson; Robyn P M Saw; Richard A Scolyer; Nicholas G Martin; Nicholas K Hayward; Stuart MacGregor
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Integrative genetic analysis suggests that skin color modifies the genetic architecture of melanoma.

Authors:  Imge Hulur; Andrew D Skol; Eric R Gamazon; Nancy J Cox; Kenan Onel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.