Literature DB >> 7985509

The age of restorations in situ.

A Jokstad1, I A Mjör, V Qvist.   

Abstract

In a cross-sectional survey the age of restorations in situ was recorded in three patient groups. Group A were randomly examined regular attenders, group B were irregular attenders randomly chosen from patient treatment records, and in group C the age of posterior gold and composite resin restorations was recorded in selected regular attenders. The study material included 8310 restorations in group A, 1281 in group B, and 500 restorations in group C. The three materials amalgam, composite, and gold accounted for more than 90% of all restorations. In group A 3.3% of the restorations were scheduled for replacement. The most prevalent reasons for replacement were secondary caries, bulk fractures of the restoration, and tooth fractures. The median age of the failed restorations was fairly similar to the median age of the acceptable restorations in situ among the regular patients (group A). The data indicate median ages of 20 years for gold restorations, 12-14 years for amalgam restorations, and 7-8 years for composite resin restorations. The restoration ages were influenced by the type and size of the restoration, the restorative material used, and possibly also the intra-oral location of the restorations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7985509     DOI: 10.3109/00016359409029052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6357            Impact factor:   2.331


  13 in total

1.  Three-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial of the posterior composite QuiXfil in class I and II cavities.

Authors:  Juergen Manhart; Hong-Yan Chen; Reinhard Hickel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Effect of CO2 laser on root caries inhibition around composite restorations: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Jociana Bandeira de Melo; Fernando Seishim Hanashiro; Washington Steagall; Miriam Lacalle Turbino; Marinês Nobre-dos-Santos; Michel Nicolau Youssef; Wanessa Christine de Souza-Zaroni
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can't predict?

Authors:  Jack L Ferracane
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Association between caries location and restorative material treatment provided.

Authors:  Erinne B Lubisich; Thomas J Hilton; Jack L Ferracane; Hristina I Pashova; Bruce Burton
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Repair or replacement of defective restorations by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Valeria V Gordan; Joseph L Riley; Saulo Geraldeli; D Brad Rindal; Vibeke Qvist; Jeffrey L Fellows; H Paul Kellum; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.634

6.  Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Jan W V van Dijken; Ulla Pallesen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  The decision to repair or replace a defective restoration is affected by who placed the original restoration: findings from the National Dental PBRN.

Authors:  Valeria V Gordan; Joseph Riley; Saulo Geraldeli; O Dale Williams; Joseph C Spoto; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Placement, replacement and longevity of composite resin-based restorations in permanent teeth in Greece.

Authors:  Nikolaos A Chrysanthakopoulos
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.607

9.  Indirect composite restorations luted with two different procedures: A ten years follow up clinical trial.

Authors:  Nicola Barabanti; Alessandro Preti; Michele Vano; Giacomo Derchi; Francesco Mangani; Antonio Cerutti
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-02-01

10.  Fracture resistance of posterior teeth restored with modern restorative materials.

Authors:  Ibrahim M Hamouda; Salah H Shehata
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2011-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.