Literature DB >> 7985397

[Augmentation of VDS (ventral derotation spondylodesis) using double rod instrumentation: surgical method and early results].

H Halm1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The advantages of the VDS according to Zielke with excellent three dimensional correction and shorter fusion levels in comparison to posterior instrumentation techniques are well known. A disadvantage is the postoperatively necessary long immobilisation in a body cast due to lack of primary stability. Aim of the presented double-rod-VDS is to optimize the system by augmentation and allow a postoperative plaster cast- and brace-free treatment. METHOD AND MATERIAL: Following thoracolumbar phrenotomy and ligation of the segmental vessels Kaneda-clamps are inserted. First VDS-screws are implanted into the posterior holes of these clamps. Using a M-4 compression rod, correction is obtained by centripetal compressive forces to the nuts. Next VDS-screws for the M-5 treated rod are inserted into the anterior holes of the Kaneda clamps. The rod is implanted in a slightly compressive manner and augments the system. Within a prospective study 12 patients with idiopathic and neuromuscular scoliosis underwent this surgical procedure. Three patients with thoracolumbar scoliosis have been followed for 12 months postoperatively and are presented as case reports. All patients were treated brace-free postoperatively, only using a semi-elastic vest for 4 months.
RESULTS: Remarkable intra- and postoperative complications have not been noted. Curve correction ranged from 75 to 86%. Implant related complications and loss of correction have not been noted so far. The sagittal plane was within physiological limits postoperatively. Scanning stereography demonstrated excellent three dimensional correction.
CONCLUSION: The results of the Double-rod-VDS allow the statement, that the advantages of the VDS according to Zielke are optimized by augmentation of the system with the possibility of plaster cast and brace-free postoperative treatment. Larger operation numbers and a longer follow-up period are needed for further assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7985397     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1039841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb        ISSN: 0044-3220


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of anterior and posterior double-rod instrumentation for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: results of 141 patients.

Authors:  Michael Thomas Muschik; Holger Kimmich; Thomas Demmel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Anterior scoliosis surgery. State of the art and a comparison with posterior techniques].

Authors:  H Halm; A Richter; B Thomsen; M Köszegvary; M Ahrens; M Quante
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.