Literature DB >> 7985094

The predictive value of diagnostic tests for pheochromocytoma.

G R Peplinski1, J A Norton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ascertaining or excluding a pheochromocytoma may be difficult. The purpose of this study is to identify preoperative tests that are good predictors of a pheochromocytoma.
METHODS: Patients presumptively diagnosed with a pheochromocytoma based on clinical assessment, plasma or urinary catecholamines, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging were analyzed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were determined for each test based on the pathologic finding of a pheochromocytoma. Data were analyzed with Student's t test or Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: Of 14 patients, seven had pathologically proven pheochromocytomas, whereas three had cortical adenomas. In four patients, a pheochromocytoma was excluded by repeat testing. The 24-hour urinary mean metanephrine levels were significantly different between patients with and without pheochromocytomas (5.8 micrograms vs 0.5 micrograms, p = 0.05) and had the best positive predictive value (83%) and negative predictive value (100%) of the biochemical tests. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging had a 100% positive and negative predictive value. Age, sex, symptoms, blood pressure, tumor location, tumor size, and plasma catecholamine levels could not accurately predict or exclude a pheochromocytoma.
CONCLUSIONS: T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is the imaging study of choice for predicting a pheochromocytoma. The 24-hour urinary metanephrine level is the single best biochemical indicator of a pheochromocytoma. Plasma catecholamine levels and computed tomography are not helpful in diagnosing or excluding a pheochromocytoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7985094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  6 in total

1.  Coexisting extraadrenal pheochromocytoma and von Meyenberg complexes: report of a case.

Authors:  F Tanaka; M Mori; M Haraguchi; N Makino; Y Yoshikawa; T Akiyoshi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Adrenalectomy for familial pheochromocytoma in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  L Michael Brunt; Terry C Lairmore; Gerard M Doherty; Mary A Quasebarth; Mary DeBenedetti; Jeffrey F Moley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Pheochromocytoma in MEN 2A syndrome. Study of 54 patients.

Authors:  Jose M Rodriguez; Maria Balsalobre; Jose L Ponce; Antonio Ríos; Nuria M Torregrosa; Javier Tebar; Pascual Parrilla
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Gaining experience by graded approach.

Authors:  Abhay N Dalvi; Pinky M Thapar; K Vijay Kumar; Ranjeet S Kamble; Sameer A Rege; Aparna A Deshpande; Nalini S Shah; Padma S Menon
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  A systematic review of the literature examining the diagnostic efficacy of measurement of fractionated plasma free metanephrines in the biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Anna M Sawka; Ally PH Prebtani; Lehana Thabane; Amiram Gafni; Mitchell Levine; William F Young
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 2.763

6.  Diagnosis and surgical treatment of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A.

Authors:  Kun-Long Tang; Yi Lin; Li-Ming Li
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.754

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.