Literature DB >> 7983167

The role of transcription factors, chromatin structure and DNA replication in 5 S RNA gene regulation.

A P Wolffe1.   

Abstract

Differential expression of the oocyte and somatic 5 S RNA genes during Xenopus development can be explained by changes in transcription factor and histone interactions with the two types of gene. Both factors and histones bind 5 S RNA genes with specificity. Protein-protein interactions determine the stability of potentially transcriptionally active or repressed nucleoprotein complexes. A decline in transcription factor abundance, differential binding of transcription factors to oocyte and somatic 5 S genes, and increased competition with the histones for association with DNA during early embryogenesis, can account for the developmental decision to selectively repress the oocyte genes, while retaining the somatic genes in the transcriptionally active state. The 5 S ribosomal genes of Xenopus are perhaps the simplest eukaryotic genes to show regulated expression during development. A large multigene family (oocyte 5 S DNA) is transcriptionally active in oocytes but is repressed in somatic cells, whereas a small multigene family (somatic 5 S DNA) is active in both cell types. A potential molecular mechanism to explain the developmental switch that turns off oocyte 5 S DNA transcription has been experimentally reconstructed in vitro and more recently tested in vivo. Central to this mechanism is the specific association of both transcription factors and histones with 5 S RNA genes. How the interplay of histones and transcription factors is thought to affect transcription, and how their respective contributions might change during development from an oocyte, to an embryo and eventually to a somatic cell is the focus of this review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7983167     DOI: 10.1242/jcs.107.8.2055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  14 in total

1.  Rearrangement of chromatin domains during development in Xenopus.

Authors:  Y Vassetzky; A Hair; M Méchali
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Evolutionary patterns of non-coding RNAs.

Authors:  Athanasius F Bompfünewerer; Christoph Flamm; Claudia Fried; Guido Fritzsch; Ivo L Hofacker; Jörg Lehmann; Kristin Missal; Axel Mosig; Bettina Müller; Sonja J Prohaska; Bärbel M R Stadler; Peter F Stadler; Andrea Tanzer; Stefan Washietl; Christina Witwer
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.919

3.  Differential kinetics of transcription complex assembly distinguish oocyte and somatic 5S RNA genes of Xenopus.

Authors:  S J McBryant; J M Gottesfeld
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  1997

4.  Gal4p-mediated chromatin remodeling depends on binding site position in nucleosomes but does not require DNA replication.

Authors:  M Xu; R T Simpson; M P Kladde
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Prolonged glucocorticoid exposure dephosphorylates histone H1 and inactivates the MMTV promoter.

Authors:  H L Lee; T K Archer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-03-02       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Chromatin structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA topoisomerase I promoter in different growth phases.

Authors:  L Rubbi; G Camilloni; M Caserta; E Di Mauro; S Venditti
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Silkworm TFIIIB binds both constitutive and silk gland-specific tRNA Ala promoters but protects only the constitutive promoter from DNase I cleavage.

Authors:  L S Young; N Ahnert; K U Sprague
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Histone H1 phosphorylation by Cdk2 selectively modulates mouse mammary tumor virus transcription through chromatin remodeling.

Authors:  R N Bhattacharjee; G C Banks; K W Trotter; H L Lee; T K Archer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  The chromatin structure of the long control region of human papillomavirus type 16 represses viral oncoprotein expression.

Authors:  W Stünkel; H U Bernard
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  A plant 5S ribosomal RNA mimic regulates alternative splicing of transcription factor IIIA pre-mRNAs.

Authors:  Ming C Hammond; Andreas Wachter; Ronald R Breaker
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 15.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.