Literature DB >> 7982849

Breeding for profit: synergism between genetic improvement and livestock production (a review).

D L Harris1, S Newman.   

Abstract

Fifty years of research in animal breeding and genetics are examined from four perspectives: 1) genetic prediction, 2) animal testing and selection schemes, 3) dissemination of genetic improvement, and 4) definition of breeding objectives in economic form. Breeding in all classes of livestock has moved from a purebred appearance orientation to a performance (either purebred or crossbred) orientation. Unfortunately, the evolution from a performance orientation to an economic orientation is incomplete, especially for some livestock classes. Placing breeding objectives into a mathematical form on a sound economic basis is key to integrating modern developments in animal breeding into more purposeful industry programs. Procedures used to develop such objectives are reviewed with attention to common approaches. Where consensus is reached about a breeding objective (in economic form) for a class of livestock, this objective can be used in conjunction with genetic predictions to rank animals within a breeding population. Ranking without undue attention to herd of origin facilitates a pyramid-shaped hierarchy of animals that can be fundamental to the functioning of breeding enterprises contributing improvements to operations concerned with production. Genetic improvements should flow from proven genetically superior animals to improved production systems. The tiers of the pyramid need to be organized relative to animals with differing levels of economic evaluation.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7982849     DOI: 10.2527/1994.7282178x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

1.  Effect of pre-weaning selection on estimates of genetic parameters and breeding values for post-weaning growth rate of beef bulls on test.

Authors:  M L Mashiloane; K A Nephawe; A Maiwashe; D Norris; J W Ngambi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Breeding objectives for pigs in Kenya. II: economic values incorporating risks in different smallholder production systems.

Authors:  Jackson Mwenda Mbuthia; Thomas Odiwuor Rewe; Alexander Kigunzu Kahi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Genetic evaluation of hip score in UK Labrador Retrievers.

Authors:  Thomas W Lewis; Sarah C Blott; John A Woolliams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Methods to address poultry robustness and welfare issues through breeding and associated ethical considerations.

Authors:  William M Muir; Heng-Wei Cheng; Candace Croney
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  The Effect of Using Organic or Conventional Sires on Genetic Gain in Organic Pigs: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Roos Marina Zaalberg; Hanne Marie Nielsen; Anders Christian Sørensen; Thinh T Chu; Just Jensen; Trine Michelle Villumsen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  A physical map of the bovine genome.

Authors:  Warren M Snelling; Readman Chiu; Jacqueline E Schein; Matthew Hobbs; Colette A Abbey; David L Adelson; Jan Aerts; Gary L Bennett; Ian E Bosdet; Mekki Boussaha; Rudiger Brauning; Alexandre R Caetano; Marcos M Costa; Allan M Crawford; Brian P Dalrymple; André Eggen; Annelie Everts-van der Wind; Sandrine Floriot; Mathieu Gautier; Clare A Gill; Ronnie D Green; Robert Holt; Oliver Jann; Steven Jm Jones; Steven M Kappes; John W Keele; Pieter J de Jong; Denis M Larkin; Harris A Lewin; John C McEwan; Stephanie McKay; Marco A Marra; Carrie A Mathewson; Lakshmi K Matukumalli; Stephen S Moore; Brenda Murdoch; Frank W Nicholas; Kazutoyo Osoegawa; Alice Roy; Hanni Salih; Laurent Schibler; Robert D Schnabel; Licia Silveri; Loren C Skow; Timothy Pl Smith; Tad S Sonstegard; Jeremy F Taylor; Ross Tellam; Curtis P Van Tassell; John L Williams; James E Womack; Natasja H Wye; George Yang; Shaying Zhao
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 7.  Genotype by environment interaction and breeding for robustness in livestock.

Authors:  Wendy M Rauw; Luis Gomez-Raya
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.599

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.