Literature DB >> 7982826

Antiemetic drugs attenuate food aversions in sheep.

F D Provenza1, L Ortega-Reyes, C B Scott, J J Lynch, E A Burritt.   

Abstract

Ruminants learn to avoid many foods that contain toxins by associating the flavor of the foods with aversive postingestive feedback. We hypothesized the emetic system is a cause of aversive feedback, and three experiments were conducted to determine whether antiemetic drugs (diphenhydramine, metoclopramide, dexamethasone) would attenuate food aversions caused by the toxicant lithium chloride (LiCl). Lambs were assigned to one of four treatments: antiemetics plus LiCl (A + L), antiemetics alone (A), LiCl alone (L), or neither antiemetics nor LiCl (C). The LiCl was administered immediately after sheep ate oats, wheat, and milo in Exp. 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The antiemetics were given 1 h before and at the time LiCl was administered to sheep. Lambs that received antiemetics (A and A + L) consistently ate more grain than lambs that did not receive the drugs (C and L) (Exp. 1, P < .08; Exp. 2, P < .05; Exp. 3, P < .08), and there was no interaction between antiemetics and LiCl. Thus, the results of all three experiments were consistent with the hypothesis that antiemetic drugs attenuate food aversions caused by the toxicant LiCl because sheep receiving antiemetic drugs (Group A + L) ate more grain than sheep not receiving the drugs (Group L). In addition, we suggest aversive postingestive feedback limited intake of grain because sheep receiving antiemetic drugs (Group A) ate somewhat more grain than sheep not receiving the drugs (Group C).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7982826     DOI: 10.2527/1994.7281989x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  Behavioural contributions to the regulated intake of plant secondary metabolites in koalas.

Authors:  Karen J Marsh; Ian R Wallis; William J Foley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The dilemma of foraging herbivores: dealing with food and fear.

Authors:  Clare McArthur; Peter B Banks; Rudy Boonstra; Jennifer Sorensen Forbey
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Plant Secondary Metabolites as Rodent Repellents: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sabine C Hansen; Caroline Stolter; Christian Imholt; Jens Jacob
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Inhibition of snowshoe hare succinate dehydrogenase activity as a mechanism of deterrence for papyriferic acid in birch.

Authors:  Jennifer Sorensen Forbey; Xinzhu Pu; Dong Xu; Knut Kielland; John Bryant
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Dynamics of the volatile defense of winter "dormant" balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera).

Authors:  Thomas P Clausen; Janice Chen; John P Bryant; Frederick D Provenza; Juan Villalba
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Kangaroos avoid eating seedlings with or near others with volatile essential oils.

Authors:  Anthea S Jones; Byron B Lamont; Meredith M Fairbanks; Christine M Rafferty
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  How goats learn to distinguish between novel foods that differ in postingestive consequences.

Authors:  F D Provenza; J J Lynch; E A Burritt; C B Scott
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  The relative importance of mother and toxicosis in the selection of foods by lambs.

Authors:  F D Provenza; J J Lynch; J V Nolan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 9.  A Case for Eustress in Grazing Animals.

Authors:  Juan J Villalba; Xavier Manteca
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-09-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.