Literature DB >> 7982698

Family costs associated with severe mental illness and substance use.

R E Clark1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study's aim was to document the economic assistance in the form of money, in-kind contributions, and time spent in care-giving by families of adults with both severe mental illness and substance use disorders.
METHODS: A total of 119 families of adults with dual disorders were compared with a similar group of 127 families whose adult children had no chronic illnesses. In telephone interviews, parents reported the amount of money, goods, and direct care family members gave to a designated adult child. Two methods were used to estimate the value of family time: opportunity costs, based on the average wage for production workers in the study area, and the cost of paid substitutes for the task being performed.
RESULTS: Parents of adults with dual disorders reported that family members gave significantly more money and time to the adult child than did parents of adults with no chronic illnesses. The estimated value of family assistance in the dual disorder group was $9,703 using the opportunity-cost method and $13,891 using the substitution method, compared with costs of $2,421 and $3,547 for the group with no chronic illnesses.
CONCLUSIONS: Dual disorders impose a significant economic burden on families. Direct support that families provide to adult children with dual disorders should be considered carefully in treatment planning and policy decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7982698     DOI: 10.1176/ps.45.8.808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hosp Community Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-1597


  12 in total

Review 1.  Managing comorbid schizophrenia and substance abuse.

Authors:  R E Drake; K T Mueser
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Severely mentally ill patients with and without substance use disorders: characteristics associated with treatment attrition.

Authors:  A B Primm; M B Gomez; I Tzolova-Iontchev; W Perry; H T Vu; R M Crum
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2000-06

3.  Perceived reasons for substance misuse among persons with a psychiatric disorder.

Authors:  Alexandra B Laudet; Stephen Magura; Howard S Vogel; Edward L Knight
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  2004-07

4.  Economic expenditures associated with instrumental caregiving roles of adult siblings of persons with severe mental illness.

Authors:  Steven P Lohrer; Ellen P Lukens; Helle Thorning
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2007-04

5.  Cost-effectiveness of assertive community treatment versus standard case management for persons with co-occurring severe mental illness and substance use disorders.

Authors:  R E Clark; G B Teague; S K Ricketts; P W Bush; H Xie; T G McGuire; R E Drake; G J McHugo; A M Keller; M Zubkoff
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Organizational guidelines for dual disorders programs.

Authors:  C C Mercer; K T Mueser; R E Drake
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  1998

Review 7.  Measuring the costs of schizophrenia. Implications for the post-institutional era in the US.

Authors:  K G Terkelsen; A Menikoff
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Effects of "dual focus" mutual aid on self-efficacy for recovery and quality of life.

Authors:  Stephen Magura; Charles Cleland; Howard S Vogel; Edward L Knight; Alexandre B Laudet
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2007-01

9.  The effect of 12-step based fellowship participation on abstinence among dually diagnosed persons: a two-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Alexandre B Laudet; Stephen Magura; Charles M Cleland; Howard S Vogel; Edward L Knight; Andrew Rosenblum
Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs       Date:  2004-06

10.  Perception of burden by caregivers of patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Sunil Srivastava
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.