Literature DB >> 7981943

Parental genome separation and asynchronous centromere division in interspecific F1 hybrids in Lathyrus.

M A Callimassia1, B G Murray, K R Hammett, M D Bennett.   

Abstract

Chromosomes were studied in root-tip metaphase cells of several F1 interspecific Lathyrus hybrids including: L. hirsutus x L. cassius (H x C), L. cassius x L. hirsutus (C x H), L. cassius x L. odoratus (C x O), and their parents, all with 2n = 2x = 14. Two types of morphologically distinct centromeres were identified in the hybrids on the basis of the degree of contraction of the primary constriction. At least 12 well-defined centromeres were seen in all cells of L. hirsutus, L. cassius and L. odoratus, and about 80% of cells had 14. The hybrids were more variable than the species. H x O contained between six and 14 well-defined centromeres, while cells of H x C, C x H and C x O all had seven well-defined and seven weakly defined centromeres. These were used as markers to plot their spatial disposition in two dimensions on metaphase spreads. In H x C, C x H and C x O the two types of centromeres showed a significant tendency to occupy two spatially distinct and concentrically arranged domains on the metaphase plate (P < 0.005). Owing to shortage of material subsequent work was restricted to H x C and C x H. Six or seven chromosomes of one parental genome were selectively labelled by in situ hybridization using biotinylated total genomic DNA from either parent as a probe. Moreover, there was a very strong correlation between centromere type and genomic origin (P < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7981943     DOI: 10.1007/BF01552798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  24 in total

1.  The fate of recombinant chromosomes and genome interaction in Nicotiana asymmetric somatic hybrids and their sexual progeny.

Authors:  A S Parokonny; A Kenton; Y Y Gleba; M D Bennett
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  DNA topoisomerase II must act at mitosis to prevent nondisjunction and chromosome breakage.

Authors:  C Holm; T Stearns; D Botstein
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  The male-derived genome after sperm-egg fusion: spatial distribution of chromosomal DNA and paternal-maternal genomic association.

Authors:  B F Brandriff; L A Gordon; R Segraves; D Pinkel
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Characterization of the Nicotiana tabacum L. genome by molecular cytogenetics.

Authors:  A Kenton; A S Parokonny; Y Y Gleba; M D Bennett
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1993-08

5.  Chromosome segregation from cell hybrids. V. Does segregation result from asynchronous centromere separation?

Authors:  J A Graves; P A Zelesco
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.166

6.  A dominantly inherited cytogenetic anomaly: a possible cell division mutant.

Authors:  N L Rudd; I E Teshima; R H Martin; J E Sisken; R Weksberg
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Non-reciprocal gonadal dysgenesis in hybrids of the chironomid midge Chironomus thummi. III. Germ line specific abnormalities.

Authors:  K Hägele; B Oschmann
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 8.  Sequence of centromere separation: occurrence, possible significance, and control.

Authors:  B K Vig
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  1983-03

9.  Nonrandom chromosome arrangements in germ line nuclei of Sciara coprophila males: the basis for nonrandom chromosome segregation on the meiosis I spindle.

Authors:  D F Kubai
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Hordeum and Secale mitotic genomes lie apart in a hybrid.

Authors:  R A Finch; J B Smith; M D Bennett
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  2 in total

1.  Nuclear fusion and genome encounter during yeast zygote formation.

Authors:  Alan Michael Tartakoff; Purnima Jaiswal
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  Variability in the amount of homoeologous pairing among F1 hybrids.

Authors:  Lidia Poggio; Eduardo Greizerstein; María Ferrari
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.276

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.