Human and rat peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) demonstrate similar tissue distribution but different responsiveness to PPAR activators.

We have isolated a human peroxisomal proliferator activated receptor (hPPAR) from a human liver cDNA library. Based on sequence analysis, we have determined that this cDNA encodes the human PPAR alpha. When assayed in a reconstituted hPPAR responsive transcription system in mammalian CV-1 cells, this receptor was shown to be transcriptionally activated by hypolipidemic agents like clofibric acid, and ETYA (5,8,11,14-eicosatetraynoic acid; a synthetic arachidonic acid homolog). When analyzed in CV-1 cells, the rat PPAR alpha was similarly transcriptionally regulated. However, when assayed in a human liver cell line (HepG2) we noticed that ETYA was a more efficient activator of hPPAR alpha than rPPAR alpha. Thus, factors other than the receptor are important in determining the cellular responsiveness to this class of compounds. Interestingly, WY-14,643, another peroxisome proliferator, was a much more potent activator of rPPAR alpha than human PPAR alpha when assayed in both cell lines. This may explain in part why certain fibrates are potent hepatocarcinogens in rodents. Northern analysis indicates that hPPAR alpha and rPPAR alpha are well expressed in heart, kidney and liver. We further demonstrate that hPPAR alpha and human retinoid X receptor alpha synergistically interact to bind and transactivate through a peroxisomal proliferator response element. Thus in a similar cell and promoter context the rat and human PPARs show a differential response to certain activators. Cumulatively these data suggest that differential ligand responsiveness does not provide a complete explanation for the different biological effects exhibited by hypolipidemic drugs when administered to humans and rats.