Literature DB >> 7979938

Return to work following an aquafitness and muscle strengthening program for the low back injured.

S M LeFort1, T E Hannah.   

Abstract

Our purpose, in this prospective clinical study, was to identify the best predictors of 2-month return to work or retraining for a group of low back injured subjects (n = 40) who completed at least 8 weeks of a community-based rehabilitation program that combined aerobic and flexibility exercise conducted in the water (aquafitness) with muscle strength and endurance training. Baseline demographic characteristics and changes in physical fitness, pain, disability, and psychological well-being during the course of program participation were compared between two groups of low back injured subjects: those who returned to work (RTW) [n = 24], and those who did not (N-RTW) [n = 16]. Subjects in both groups showed comparable improvement in measures of physical fitness at 8 weeks. However, multivariate analyses showed significant between-group differences in self-report measures. The RTW group showed significant improvement in measures of pain, disability, anxiety, and vigor while self-esteem and affect remained stable. The N-RTW group displayed no change in pain and disability variables and had significant deterioration in mean overall psychological well-being over time. The best predictors of return to work using logistic regression analyses were a first injury rather than a repeat injury to the lower back, and stability in self-esteem. Suggestions are offered for further research to examine the benefits of aquafit exercise for the low back injured, for additional interventions for those with a reinjury, and for maintaining or enhancing self-esteem as a treatment goal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7979938     DOI: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90014-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  6 in total

Review 1.  What predicts outcome in non-operative treatments of chronic low back pain? A systematic review.

Authors:  Tina Wessels; Maurits van Tulder; Tanja Sigl; Thomas Ewert; Heribert Limm; Gerold Stucki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Functional results and the risk factors of reoperations after lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  Bilge Kara; Zeliha Tulum; Umit Acar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Exercise reduces C-reactive protein and improves physical function in automotive workers with low back pain.

Authors:  Sang Kook Kim; Ilho Jung; Jae Hee Kim
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-05-08

4.  The impact of aerobic fitness on functioning in chronic back pain.

Authors:  Marjon E A Wormgoor; Aage Indahl; Maurits W van Tulder; Han C G Kemper
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effects of triple-treatment trunk stretching on physical fitness and curvature of the spine.

Authors:  Koichi Wakimoto; Toshifumi Dakeshita; Junichi Wakimoto; Toshiaki Watanabe; Saiki Terasawa; Masao Okuhara; Yuki Murata; Naoya Taki; Ryoji Uchiyama; Kazuki Ashida; Suchinda Jarupat Maruo; Koji Terasawa
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-12-01

6.  Comparative efficacy of three active treatment modules on psychosocial variables in patients with long-term mechanical low-back pain: a randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Chidozie Emmanuel Mbada; Olusola Ayanniyi; Samuel Olusegun Ogunlade
Journal:  Arch Physiother       Date:  2015-09-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.