Literature DB >> 7979282

Pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone during plasma exchange in polyarteritis nodosa patients.

F Fauvelle1, O Lortholary, M Tod, L Guillevin, M Louchahi, A Léon, O Petitjean.   

Abstract

Plasma exchange (PE) is currently being used to treat a variety of disorders involving immune complexes, such as polyarteritis nodosa. This procedure removes endogenous toxic components that accumulate in patients with this disease, but it also removes drugs. Plasma-protein binding and the volume of distribution (V) are two kinetic parameters which strongly affect the efficiency of drug removal by PE. Drugs that are highly bound to plasma proteins and have a low V may show a marked decrease in plasma levels as a result of PE. Because ceftriaxone exhibits saturable plasma-protein binding, which influences its pharmacokinetic parameters, particularly its V, we evaluated its removal during PE therapy in this nonrandomized crossover study. Twelve polyarteritis nodosa patients undergoing PE were studied. Each patient was given ceftriaxone intravenously in doses of 1 and 3 g on days 4 and 11, respectively, immediately before (n = six patients; group I) and 6 h before (n = six patients; group II) PE. Plasma was assayed for ceftriaxone by high-pressure liquid chromatography. The mean amounts eliminated +/- standard deviations were 230.8 +/- 38.5 mg (1 g) and 750.0 +/- 168.5 mg (3 g) for group I and 161.0 +/- 66.0 mg (1 g) and 347.0 +/- 121.0 mg (3 g) for group II. The drug fractions eliminated by PE were 23.0% +/- 3.9% (1-g dose) and 24.9% +/- 5.6% (3-g dose) for group I (P > 0.05), and 16.6% +/- 5.9% (1-g dose) and 11.5% +/- 4.0% (3-g dose) for group II (P < 0.05). These results showed that the drug fraction eliminated decreased when V increased only when the distribution phase of ceftriaxone had been completed (group II). These findings suggest that PE may influence ceftriaxone disposition and that it would be better to administer the drug after PE to assure its therapeutic efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7979282      PMCID: PMC284586          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.38.7.1519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  10 in total

1.  Altered drug binding due to the use of indwelling heparinized cannulas (heparin lock) for sampling.

Authors:  M Wood; D G Shand; A J Wood
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Diclofenac, paracetamol, and vidarabine removal during plasma exchange in polyarteritis nodosa patients.

Authors:  F Fauvelle; P Nicolas; A Leon; M Tod; G Perret; O Petitjean; L Guillevin
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  1991 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 1.627

3.  Effect of plasma exchange on the steady-state kinetics of digoxin and digitoxin.

Authors:  F Keller; G Kreutz; H F Vöhringer; G Offermann; A Distler
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Pharmacokinetic considerations in exchange transfusion in neonates.

Authors:  G J Yakatan; R B Smith; R D Leff; J L Kay
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Kinetics of ceftazidime during plasmapheresis.

Authors:  F Bozkurt; P Schollmeyer; E Keller
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  Protein binding of cardiac glycosides in disease states.

Authors:  L Storstein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1977 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Variability in heparin effect on serum drug binding.

Authors:  C A Naranjo; E M Sellers; V Khouw; P Alexander; T Fan; J Shaw
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Effects of concentration-dependent plasma protein binding on ceftriaxone kinetics.

Authors:  K Stoeckel; P J McNamara; R Brandt; H Plozza-Nottebrock; W H Ziegler
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Acyclovir pharmacokinetics in plasmapheresis.

Authors:  P Y Chavanet; F Bailly; C Mousson; A Waldner-Combernoux; F Lokiec; J M Rebibou; J M Chalopin; H Portier
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.821

10.  Influence of therapeutic plasmapheresis on elimination of ceftiaxone.

Authors:  J S Bakken; S J Cavalieri; D Gangeness; T Kubat; J R Pollack
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.191

  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Drug Dosing in Patients Undergoing Therapeutic Plasma Exchange.

Authors:  Sherif Hanafy Mahmoud; Jessica Buhler; Eric Chu; Suzie A Chen; Theresa Human
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 2.  Is Antimicrobial Treatment Effective During Therapeutic Plasma Exchange? Investigating the Role of Possible Interactions.

Authors:  Łukasz J Krzych; Marcelina Czok; Zbigniew Putowski
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 6.321

3.  Clinical pharmacist assessment of drug-related problems among intensive care unit patients in a Turkish university hospital.

Authors:  Aslınur Albayrak; Bilgen Başgut; Gülbin Aygencel Bıkmaz; Bensu Karahalil
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.