Literature DB >> 7978358

The influence of geometry on the stress distribution in joints--a finite element analysis.

F Eckstein1, B Merz, P Schmid, R Putz.   

Abstract

The incongruity of human joints is a phenomenon which has long been recognized, and recent CT-osteoabsorptiometric findings suggest that this incongruity influences the distribution of stress in joints during their normal physiological use. The finite element method (FEM) was therefore applied to five different geometric configurations consistent with the anatomy of articular surfaces, and a program with variable contact areas (Marc) was used to calculate the stress distribution for loads of 100 to 6,900 N. The assumption of congruity between head and socket results in a "bell-shaped" distribution of stress with a maximum value of 61.5 N/mm2 in the depths of the socket, decreasing towards zero at its edges. In the model with a flatter socket the von Mises stresses are higher (max. 101.3 N/mm2); with a deeper socket, lower (max. 53.0 N/mm2). If the diameter of the head is greater, the stresses build up from the periphery of the socket and move towards its depths as the load increases. The combination of an oversized head and a deeper socket results in the most satisfactory stress distribution (max. 43.2 N/mm2). These results extend previous photoelastic findings with incongruous joint surfaces. The calculated mechanical conditions show a relationship to the location of osteoarthritic changes, and are reflected by the distribution pattern of subchondral bone density. A more satisfactory stress distribution is found with functionally advantageous, incongruous joint surfaces (oversized head and deepened socket) than in the congruous joint, and a better nutritive situation for the articular cartilage seems likely.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7978358     DOI: 10.1007/BF00186828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)        ISSN: 0340-2061


  46 in total

1.  [Areas of contact in human humero-ulnar joints as a function of pressure, their connection through subchondral mineralization and joint surface morphology of the incisura trochlearis].

Authors:  F Eckstein; F Löhe; M Steinlechner; M Müller-Gerbl; R Putz
Journal:  Ann Anat       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Physiological incongruity of the humero-ulnar joint: a functional principle of optimized stress distribution acting upon articulating surfaces?

Authors:  F Eckstein; F Löhe; E Schulte; M Müller-Gerbl; S Milz; R Putz
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1993-11

3.  The apparent elastic modulus of the juxtarticular subchondral bone of the femoral head.

Authors:  T D Brown; M S Vrahas
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Relation of coxarthrosis to stresses and morphogenesis. A finite element analysis.

Authors:  D R Carter; D J Rapperport; D P Fyhrie; D J Schurman
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1987-12

5.  People in different age groups show different hip-joint morphology.

Authors:  M Müller-Gerbl; R Putz; R Kenn; R Kierse
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  The morphology of the calcification front in articular cartilage. Its significance in joint function.

Authors:  P G Bullough; A Jagannath
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1983-01

7.  Distribution of subchondral bone density and cartilage thickness in the human patella.

Authors:  F Eckstein; M Müller-Gerbl; R Putz
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  The effect of continuous mechanical pressure upon the turnover of articular cartilage proteoglycans in vitro.

Authors:  I L Jones; A Klämfeldt; T Sandström
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  [Transverse groove of the elbow joint. A biomechanical interpretation of its origin].

Authors:  W Oberländer; R Breul; H J Kurrat
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1984 Sep-Oct

10.  The geometry of diarthrodial joints, its physiologic maintenance, and the possible significance of age-related changes in geometry-to-load distribution and the development of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  P G Bullough
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  2 in total

1.  The layer concept: utilization in determining the pain generators, pathology and how structure determines treatment.

Authors:  Peter Draovitch; Jaime Edelstein; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-03

Review 2.  Toward patient-specific articular contact mechanics.

Authors:  Gerard A Ateshian; Corinne R Henak; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.712

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.