R H Spiro1, E W Strong, J P Shah. 1. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Commencing in 1984, we initiated a head and neck service surgical database that included a classification system for neck dissection. The aim was to reduce the confusion in terminology resulting from growing interest in modifications of conventional radical neck dissection. METHODS: We considered a neck dissection as radical when four or five lymph node levels were excised; this included patients who had an otherwise classical neck dissection for supraglottic larynx or hypopharyngeal cancer sparing level 1. Lymph-node levels removed, nonlymphatic structures preserved, and excised nonlymphatic structures not ordinarily included in a classical radical neck dissection were all specified by the operating surgeon. We defined as a selective neck dissection any lymphadenectomy that encompassed no more than three nodal levels, usually supraomohyoid (levels 1, 2, 3), or jugular (levels 2, 3, 4). We defined as a limited neck dissection any lymphadenectomy that involved removal of no more than two nodal levels. RESULTS: At the 10-year mark, this database of 10,650 patients now includes 2,635 lymphadenectomies in 2,426 patients, the precise extent of which is accurately described in each patient. CONCLUSIONS: The current classification of neck dissection does not cover all possibilities. If we define as radical those lymphadenectomies that resect four or five nodal levels and specify structures preserved or additional nonlymphatic structures sacrificed, we allow for the possibility that some procedures may be both modified and extended. Selective would describe the standard, three-level dissections (eg, supraomohyoid or jugular node dissections), and the term limited would be introduced to indicate a neck dissection that involves removal of no more than two nodal levels. Such a three-tiered classification would more accurately reflect the time and effort involved and provide a more equitable basis for reimbursement.
BACKGROUND: Commencing in 1984, we initiated a head and neck service surgical database that included a classification system for neck dissection. The aim was to reduce the confusion in terminology resulting from growing interest in modifications of conventional radical neck dissection. METHODS: We considered a neck dissection as radical when four or five lymph node levels were excised; this included patients who had an otherwise classical neck dissection for supraglottic larynx or hypopharyngeal cancer sparing level 1. Lymph-node levels removed, nonlymphatic structures preserved, and excised nonlymphatic structures not ordinarily included in a classical radical neck dissection were all specified by the operating surgeon. We defined as a selective neck dissection any lymphadenectomy that encompassed no more than three nodal levels, usually supraomohyoid (levels 1, 2, 3), or jugular (levels 2, 3, 4). We defined as a limited neck dissection any lymphadenectomy that involved removal of no more than two nodal levels. RESULTS: At the 10-year mark, this database of 10,650 patients now includes 2,635 lymphadenectomies in 2,426 patients, the precise extent of which is accurately described in each patient. CONCLUSIONS: The current classification of neck dissection does not cover all possibilities. If we define as radical those lymphadenectomies that resect four or five nodal levels and specify structures preserved or additional nonlymphatic structures sacrificed, we allow for the possibility that some procedures may be both modified and extended. Selective would describe the standard, three-level dissections (eg, supraomohyoid or jugular node dissections), and the term limited would be introduced to indicate a neck dissection that involves removal of no more than two nodal levels. Such a three-tiered classification would more accurately reflect the time and effort involved and provide a more equitable basis for reimbursement.