Literature DB >> 7977791

Osmotic barrier of the parietal peritoneum.

M F Flessner1.   

Abstract

Fluid movement into the peritoneal cavity results after instillation of a hypertonic solution. Some investigators have assumed that the peritoneum is a significant barrier to small solutes and have predicted that fluid would be drawn by an osmotic gradient into the cavity from the tissue surrounding the peritoneal cavity, resulting in tissue hydrostatic pressures well below atmospheric pressure. Contrary to this, we have previously shown that protein and fluid cross the peritoneum and enter the tissue at the same rate during either isotonic or hypertonic dialysis. To investigate the nature of the osmotic barrier of the peritoneum, the hydrostatic pressure profiles were measured in the abdominal wall of the rat during conditions of either isotonicity or hypertonicity in the peritoneal cavity and constant intraperitoneal hydrostatic pressure (Pip). Measurements were made with a micropipette mounted on a micromanipulator and connected to a servo-null pressure measurement system. No interstitial pressures below atmospheric pressure were observed with either type of solution in the peritoneal cavity. For the three Pip values tested, there were few significant differences between the corresponding pressure profiles of isotonic or hypertonic solutions. It is concluded that the parietal peritoneum is not a functional barrier to small solutes, which are often used to raise the osmolality of intraperitoneal solutions. This finding also implies that the tissue interstitium underlying the parietal peritoneum is not the source of water flow into the cavity, which is observed during hypertonic dialysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7977791     DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.1994.267.5.F861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  8 in total

1.  A theoretical model for intraperitoneal delivery of cisplatin and the effect of hyperthermia on drug penetration distance.

Authors:  Ardith W El-Kareh; Timothy W Secomb
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 2.  Aging of the Peritoneal Dialysis Membrane.

Authors:  Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 3.  Peritoneal changes in patients on long-term peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Raymond T Krediet; Dirk G Struijk
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  Monitoring of the peritoneal membrane.

Authors:  Dirk G Struijk
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2008-10

Review 5.  Supplying the trip to antibody production-nutrients, signaling, and the programming of cellular metabolism in the mature B lineage.

Authors:  Mark R Boothby; Shawna K Brookens; Ariel L Raybuck; Sung Hoon Cho
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 22.096

6.  Acquired Decline in Ultrafiltration in Peritoneal Dialysis: The Role of Glucose.

Authors:  Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 14.978

Review 7.  Exercise-related transient abdominal pain (ETAP).

Authors:  Darren Morton; Robin Callister
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Water removal during automated peritoneal dialysis assessed by remote patient monitoring and modelling of peritoneal tissue hydration.

Authors:  Joanna Stachowska-Pietka; Beata Naumnik; Ewa Suchowierska; Rafael Gomez; Jacek Waniewski; Bengt Lindholm
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.