Literature DB >> 7977622

Measuring perceived self-efficacy in occupational therapy.

M Gage1, S Noh, H J Polatajko, V Kaspar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Occupational therapists sometimes observe an alarming discrepancy between the occupational performance skills developed in the clinical setting and the degree to which the client willingly puts these skills to use outside the clinical environment. The literature strongly suggests that perceived self-efficacy partially explains this discrepancy; however, an understanding of perceived self-efficacy has not yet been integrated into the practice of occupational therapy. Both a lack of awareness of the construct and a lack of ability to assess perceived self-efficacy within the occupational performance domain are responsible for this lack of integration into practice. This article presents the development, reliability, and validity testing of a measure of perceived self-efficacy developed particularly for use by occupational therapists, the Self-Efficacy Gauge.
METHOD: Reliability and validity testing was performed through use of a mailed survey (n = 126). Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and alternate form reliability were examined. In addition, the subjects' scores on the Gauge were compared to actual performance and a hopelessness scale.
RESULTS: The Self-Efficacy Gauge has a reasonable degree of reliability when used on a clinical sample whose perceived self-efficacy for occupational performance activities is unlikely to change. The results also provide preliminary support for the validity of the instrument.
CONCLUSION: It is recognized that without a gold standard for comparison, validity testing will be an ongoing need.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7977622     DOI: 10.5014/ajot.48.9.783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Occup Ther        ISSN: 0272-9490


  7 in total

1.  Minimal detectable change of the actual amount of use test and the motor activity log: the EXCITE Trial.

Authors:  Shuya Chen; Steven L Wolf; Qin Zhang; Paul A Thompson; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  The reliability and validity of a measure of perceived functional capacity for work in chronic back pain.

Authors:  L Gibson; J Strong
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1996-09

3.  Combined Cognitive-Strategy and Task-Specific Training Improve Transfer to Untrained Activities in Subacute Stroke: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sara McEwen; Helene Polatajko; Carolyn Baum; Jorge Rios; Dianne Cirone; Meghan Doherty; Timothy Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Incorporating a Cognitive Strategy Approach into an Outpatient Stroke Physiotherapy Programme: Case Report.

Authors:  Sara McEwen; Dianne Cirone; Betty Lee
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  The Feasibility of Using Metacognitive Strategy Training to Improve Cognitive Performance and Neural Connectivity in Women with Chemotherapy-Induced Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Timothy J Wolf; Meghan Doherty; Dorina Kallogjeri; Rebecca S Coalson; Joyce Nicklaus; Cynthia X Ma; Bradley L Schlaggar; Jay Piccirillo
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 2.935

6.  Development and preliminary evaluation of a rehabilitation consult for survivors of head and neck cancer: an intervention mapping protocol.

Authors:  Sara E McEwen; Aileen M Davis; Jennifer M Jones; Rosemary Martino; Ian Poon; Ana Maria Rodriguez; Jolie Ringash
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  A multi-faceted knowledge translation approach to support persons with stroke and cognitive impairment: evaluation protocol.

Authors:  Sara E McEwen; Michelle Donald; Deirdre Dawson; Mary Y Egan; Anne Hunt; Sylvia Quant; Sharron Runions; Elizabeth Linkewich
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 7.327

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.