Literature DB >> 7977404

Occupational case-control studies: I. Collecting information on work histories and work-related exposures.

W F Stewart1, P A Stewart.   

Abstract

The strength and credibility of evidence from occupational case-control studies largely depend on the validity and precision with which the work history is reported and the exposure is assessed. We discuss the two steps which ultimately lead to an exposure decision. The first step involves the exchange between the respondent and an interviewer. The latter is usually naïve to occupations and workplace exposures and, as such, is limited to asking generic and open-ended questions about the workplace. Often, this type of information is too nonspecific to assess exposure. In the second step, an expert reviews the information reported on each occupation and decides on exposure status without contacting either the interviewer or respondent. Exposure assessment is not, therefore, integrated with data collection and, in fact, is usually not initiated until after all the interviews are completed. As such, the exposure expert does not have an opportunity to resolve questions before making the exposure decision. To improve the quality and specificity of data collected, we have developed over 40 sets of close-ended questions (branch questions) which are specific to defined occupations. These branch questions, incorporated into a computer-assisted telephone interview, are asked if selected occupations or their synonyms are reported. Second, to link the data collection process with the assessment process, we have developed a procedure called SCORE (Subject Corrected Occupational Report) which provides the industrial hygienist with a cost efficient method to ask questions directly of respondents. Shortly after each interview is completed, a computerized version of the work history is reviewed by the industrial hygienist who develops questions when more information is needed. Subsequently, respondents are mailed a form listing their reported work history along with the questions. After two mailings, 73% of participants in a pilot study returned the SCORE form.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7977404     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700260304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  21 in total

1.  Assessment of occupational exposures in a general population: comparison of different methods.

Authors:  E Tielemans; D Heederik; A Burdorf; R Vermeulen; H Veulemans; H Kromhout; K Hartog
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Development of an asthma specific job exposure matrix and its application in the epidemiological study of genetics and environment in asthma (EGEA).

Authors:  S M Kennedy; N Le Moual; D Choudat; F Kauffmann
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  A glossary for research in occupational health.

Authors:  A M García; H Checkoway
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Solvent exposures and Parkinson disease risk in twins.

Authors:  Samuel M Goldman; Patricia J Quinlan; G Webster Ross; Connie Marras; Cheryl Meng; Grace S Bhudhikanok; Kathleen Comyns; Monica Korell; Anabel R Chade; Meike Kasten; Benjamin Priestley; Kelvin L Chou; Hubert H Fernandez; Franca Cambi; J William Langston; Caroline M Tanner
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Assigning exposure to pesticides and solvents from self-reports collected by a computer assisted personal interview and expert assessment of job codes: the UK Adult Brain Tumour Study.

Authors:  S J Hepworth; A Bolton; R C Parslow; M van Tongeren; K R Muir; P A McKinney
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Paternal work stress and prolonged time to pregnancy.

Authors:  Mi-Sun Lee; Domyung Paek; Ki-Do Eum; Johannes Siegrist; Jian Li; Hye-Eun Lee; Sung-Il Cho
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 7.  Occupational risk factors for female breast cancer: a review.

Authors:  M S Goldberg; F Labrèche
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Assessment of occupational exposure in a population based case-control study: comparing postal questionnaires with personal interviews.

Authors:  B M Blatter; N Roeleveld; G A Zielhuis; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Log-Linear Modeling of Agreement among Expert Exposure Assessors.

Authors:  Phillip R Hunt; Melissa C Friesen; Susan Sama; Louise Ryan; Donald Milton
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2015-03-06

10.  Development of and Selected Performance Characteristics of CANJEM, a General Population Job-Exposure Matrix Based on Past Expert Assessments of Exposure.

Authors:  Jean-François Sauvé; Jack Siemiatycki; France Labrèche; Lesley Richardson; Javier Pintos; Marie-Pierre Sylvestre; Michel Gérin; Denis Bégin; Aude Lacourt; Tracy L Kirkham; Thomas Rémen; Romain Pasquet; Mark S Goldberg; Marie-Claude Rousseau; Marie-Élise Parent; Jérôme Lavoué
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.179

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.