Literature DB >> 7977189

Effects of cephalometric landmark validity on incisor angulation.

C K Chan1, T H Tng, U Hägg, M S Cooke.   

Abstract

An experimental cephalometric study on the accuracy of independently locating eight landmarks and the subsequent effects on the maxillary (ILs/NL) and mandibular (ILi/ML) incisor angulation was carried out on 30 dry skulls. The true location of each landmark was marked with a steel ball glued onto the skulls. Two additional steel balls were used as reference markers. A purpose-designed skullholder was made to assure a firm and reproducible positioning of the skulls in the cephalostat. Six series of cephalograms were recorded. One reference series with all the steel balls, four series each with a single steel ball marker removed, one at a time, from each jaw and one series with all the steel ball markers removed, except the reference markers. The combined method error in relocating and replacing the steel ball markers, repositioning the skulls into the skull holder, and digitizing, was low. From the first series, the true position of the palatal plane (NL), the maxillary incisor line (ILs), the mandibular plane (ML) and the mandibular incisor line (ILi) were assessed. From series 2 to 5, each of the landmarks without the steel ball markers was estimated. The accuracy of each landmark was then assessed relative to the true cephalometric plane and its perpendicular. On average, the accuracy was high for all the landmarks except posterior nasal spine (PNS), which was estimated 1.2 mm too far anteriorly (p < 0.05). The standard deviations of the accuracy of the dental and skeletal landmarks were similar, being 1.4 to 2.4 mm. The maxillary incisors were proclined 1.1 degrees (p < 0.05) by the estimates of incision superior (Is).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7977189     DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70071-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  6 in total

1.  Three-dimensional interpretation of labiolingual bone width of the lower incisors. Part II.

Authors:  R Fuhrmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Coordinating bracket torque and incisor inclination : Part 3: Validity of bracket torque values in achieving norm inclinations.

Authors:  Bernd Zimmer; Hiba Sino
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Coordinating bracket torque and incisor inclination : Part 1: The development of widely applicable equations.

Authors:  Bernd Zimmer; Hiba Sino
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Assessing lower incisor inclination change: a comparison of four cephalometric methods.

Authors:  Amritraj Jabbal; Martyn Cobourne; Nora Donaldson; Dirk Bister
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Web-based Fully Automated Cephalometric Analysis: Comparisons between App-aided, Computerized, and Manual Tracings.

Authors:  Pamir Meriç; Julia Naoumova
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-08-11

6.  A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements.

Authors:  R Nalçaci; F Oztürk; O Sökücü
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.419

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.