Literature DB >> 7977087

Long-term angiographic and clinical outcome after implantation of balloon-expandable stents in aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts.

S H Fenton1, D L Fischman, M P Savage, R A Schatz, M B Leon, D S Baim, S B King, R R Heuser, R C Curry, R C Rake.   

Abstract

Balloon angioplasty of aortocoronary saphenous vein graft lesions is associated with high restenosis and clinical event rates. The goal of this multicenter study was to assess long-term angiographic and clinical outcome of patients electively treated with single Palmaz-Schatz stents in aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts. In 198 patients (209 lesions), elective placement of single Palmaz-Schatz stents was attempted. Angiography was performed at baseline, immediately after stent placement, and at 6-month follow-up. Stent placement was successful in 98.5% of patients. One patient (0.5%) had stent thrombosis. Restenosis occurred in 34% (45 of 133) of the restudied lesions. Restenosis was lower in de novo lesions than in restenotic lesions (22% vs 51%, p < 0.001). Ostial lesions had a higher restenosis rate than nonostial lesions (61% vs 28%, p = 0.003). Freedom from death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery, and repeat angioplasty was present in 70% of patients. Eighty-two percent of patients with de novo lesions remained event-free at 1 year, whereas only 55% of patients with prior angioplasty were event-free at 1 year (p < 0.001). The use of the Palmaz-Schatz stent for the treatment of focal, de novo, aortocoronary saphenous vein graft lesions is associated with a high procedural success rate, a low angiographic restenosis rate, and low clinical event rates, including the need for repeat revascularization. The results of this study need validation by a prospective randomized trial comparing stent implantation with angioplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7977087     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90545-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

Review 1.  In stent restenosis: bane of the stent era.

Authors:  A K Mitra; D K Agrawal
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of intracoronary gamma- and beta-radiation therapy for in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Takahiro Uchida; Ameet Bakhai; Alexandra Almonacid; Taro Shibata; Barbra Cox; Richard E Kuntz
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  [Pathophysiology and therapeutic concepts in coronary restenosis].

Authors:  H G Klues; P W Radke; R Hoffmann; J vom Dahl
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Long term outcome after coronary stent implantation: a 10 year single centre experience of 1000 patients.

Authors:  R T van Domburg; D P Foley; P P de Jaegere; P de Feyter; M van den Brand; W van der Giessen; J Hamburger; P W Serruys
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  [Stent restenosis: therapy concepts and possibilities for prevention].

Authors:  P W Radke; J vom Dahl; H G Klues
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-02-15

6.  Risk factors for the development of restenosis following stent implantation of venous bypass grafts.

Authors:  U E Heidland; M P Heintzen; C J Michel; B E Strauer
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  In-stent ulceration: an unusual pathology.

Authors:  Jagadeesh Kumar Kalavakunta; Shravan Gangula; Vishal Gupta
Journal:  Case Rep Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.